/Catalogue/Prompt/cbrock84/cbrock84-headcount-fundraising-and-investor-relations

Origin: github

fundraising-and-investor-relations

Raises capital and manages the relationship afterward — deciding how much and why, understanding what dilution and preferences actually cost, running a process with real competitive tension, preparing for diligence before it starts, and reporting to investors and a board in a way that keeps support when results are bad. Use this to plan a raise, evaluate a term sheet beyond the valuation, prepare a data room, or fix reporting that is producing surprises.

by cbrock84 · updated 7d ago · imported from GitHub

Installs0+0/7d
Security score100/100
Retention 14d0%
GitHub stars1.7K

Skill logic

Execution graph
User message
Prompt rewrites behaviour
Response

SKILL.md

View on GitHub ↗

Fundraising and investor relations

Capital is bought, not received, and the terms matter more than the headline number. So does what happens for the years afterward, which is where most of the relationship actually lives.

Financing terms have legal and tax consequences that vary by structure and jurisdiction. Get qualified counsel and your accountant on any instrument before signing.

Decide the amount from the plan, not from the market

Raise against what the money buys: the milestones that will make the next raise possible, plus enough runway to reach them and to be wrong once. Working back from milestones gives a number you can defend and a story that connects the raise to the outcome.

Raising more than the plan needs is not free — it costs dilution now and sets a valuation you have to grow into. Raising too little is worse, because running out mid-plan is the weakest possible negotiating position and everyone on the other side of the table knows it.

Understand what the terms cost, because valuation is the least of them

A high valuation with punishing terms is worse than a lower one with clean terms, and founders routinely trade the second for the first because only the first is quotable.

  • Liquidation preference determines who gets paid first and how much before common shares see anything. A participating preference or a multiple can mean an apparently good exit returns little to founders and staff.
  • Anti-dilution decides what happens if the next round is lower. The broader forms can shift ownership substantially in exactly the circumstances where you can least afford it.
  • Board composition and protective provisions determine what you can do without asking. This is control, and it is permanent in a way valuation is not.
  • Option pool sizing placed before the investment dilutes existing holders only. Where the pool sits in the calculation is a real price negotiation dressed as an administrative detail.

Model the outcome at several exit values, not just the good one. The terms that matter most only express themselves in the mediocre cases, which are the most likely ones.

Run a process, because tension is what produces terms

A raise conducted sequentially with one interested party is a negotiation with one side. Run conversations in parallel on a compressed timeline so that decisions land close together.

Prepare before starting. A process that stalls while you assemble materials loses its momentum, and momentum is most of what you are manufacturing.

Assemble diligence before you need it

Cap table and every instrument that affects it, signed contracts, employment and contractor agreements with their IP assignments, financial statements and the model behind them, key metrics with their definitions, and the corporate record.

Diligence surfaces the things nobody dealt with earlier — a missing assignment from a contractor, an unsigned amendment, a metric defined differently in two places. Each is small alone and each costs time at the worst moment. Fix them before the process, not during it.

Never present a metric to investors that is defined differently from how you report it internally. That inconsistency is found, and it costs credibility disproportionately.

Report on a rhythm, and report the bad news first

Investor relationships are managed between raises. A regular update — monthly or quarterly, short, consistent in format — costs an hour and buys enormous latitude when something goes wrong.

Surprise is the thing that damages the relationship, not bad results. An investor told early about a problem is a resource; the same investor told late is a governance issue. Lead with what is not working, what you are doing, and what you need.

Ask for specific help. "Let us know if you can help" produces nothing; a named introduction or a specific question produces something.

The board is a different audience from investors

Board material goes out days ahead and is read before the meeting, so the meeting is for decisions rather than presentation. Bring the real questions, including the ones you do not have answers to — a board only shown finished thinking cannot help with anything and eventually stops trying.

Sources

references/sources.md in this skill lists the outside authorities that settle the questions here — what each one is authoritative for, and what you may do with it. Check them before answering on anything they cover, and cite what you used. Most are free to read and not free to reproduce; the use note on each is binding.

Never

  • Optimize a term sheet on valuation without modeling the preference stack at mediocre exits.
  • Start a process before the data room would survive being opened.
  • Present a metric to investors under a definition you do not use internally.
  • Let an investor learn about a material problem after it is already resolved or already worse.

Discussion

No comments yet — start the thread.

Sign in to join the discussion.

/More from cbrock84/headcount

cbrock84· 7d agoCommunity
chief-strategy-officer

Prompts · Markdown · v0.1.0

Owns where the business plays and how it wins over a multi-year horizon — portfolio choices, corporate development, strategic partnerships, and planning under uncertainty. Use this for a decision about which markets or businesses to be in, whether to build, buy, or partner, how to allocate capital across business lines, or when a long-horizon bet needs framing. Distinct from `chief-executive`, which arbitrates present-quarter conflicts.

#agent-marketplace#chatgpt-plugin#chatgpt-skills

0 1.7K
cbrock84· 7d agoCommunity
market-entry

Prompts · Markdown · v0.1.0

Decides whether and how to enter a new market — sizing demand from the bottom up rather than from a market report, testing whether your advantage transfers, choosing between organic entry, partnership and acquisition, sequencing the operational and regulatory work that entry actually requires, and setting the criteria that would tell you to stop. Use this to evaluate a new geography, segment or vertical, pressure-test an entry plan, or work out why a launched market never reached scale.

#agent-marketplace#chatgpt-plugin#chatgpt-skills

0 1.7K
cbrock84· 7d agoCommunity
mergers-and-acquisitions

Prompts · Markdown · v0.1.0

Runs corporate development — deal thesis, target screening, valuation framing, diligence, and integration planning. Use this when considering an acquisition or being approached about one, when evaluating build-versus-buy at company scale, when running or reviewing diligence, or when planning how an acquired business will actually be integrated.

#agent-marketplace#chatgpt-plugin#chatgpt-skills

0 1.7K
cbrock84· 7d agoCommunity
portfolio-strategy

Prompts · Markdown · v0.1.0

Decides where capital and attention go across business lines, products, and markets — what to fund, hold, harvest, or exit, and on what evidence. Use this to allocate budget across businesses, evaluate whether a product line should continue, decide whether to exit one, structure a portfolio review, or when several initiatives compete for the same limited investment.

#agent-marketplace#chatgpt-plugin#chatgpt-skills

0 1.7K