/Catalogue/Prompt/cbrock84/cbrock84-headcount-listing-distribution

Origin: github

listing-distribution

Gets a product listed where buyers and crawlers look — directories, marketplaces, review sites, comparison pages, and aggregators. Use this to plan a submission push, choose which directories are worth the effort, prepare listing assets, build comparison and alternative pages, or manage presence on review platforms.

by cbrock84 · updated 7d ago · imported from GitHub

Installs0+0/7d
Security score100/100
Retention 14d0%
GitHub stars1.7K

Skill logic

Execution graph
User message
Prompt rewrites behaviour
Response

SKILL.md

View on GitHub ↗

Listing distribution

Low effort, compounding, and consistently under-done. Also easy to do in a way that wastes weeks.

Choosing where to list

Judge each by whether real buyers use it, not by domain authority. The directories worth the time are the ones your buyers already consult during evaluation.

  • Category review sites — highest value where they exist for your category. Buyers read these during active evaluation.
  • Curated niche directories — moderate traffic, good qualification, usually a real editorial bar.
  • Launch platforms — a spike, not a channel. Worth doing once, with preparation.
  • Bulk submission lists — mostly worthless, and the low-quality end carries real risk. Skip them.

Preparing once, reusing everywhere

Assemble a kit before submitting anywhere: descriptions at several lengths, logo and screenshots at the common sizes, category selections, feature list, pricing summary, and the founder or company details these forms always want. Submissions then take minutes instead of an afternoon each.

Keep the positioning identical across listings. Inconsistent descriptions across directories are both a brand problem and a signal problem.

Review platforms

The listings that most influence buyers. Claim the profile, complete it fully, and keep it current — a stale listing with old pricing costs deals.

Ask for reviews from customers at a success moment, never with an incentive tied to sentiment. Respond to every negative review specifically and without defensiveness; prospects read the responses more carefully than the reviews.

Comparison and alternative pages

Pages targeting "X versus Y" and "alternatives to X" capture buyers already in evaluation, which is the highest-intent traffic available.

Write them honestly. Name where the competitor is genuinely better — a comparison that finds you superior on every axis is not believed, and buyers checking it against their own experience will discount the whole page. Keep them current; a comparison against a competitor's two-year-old feature set is worse than nothing.

Maintaining

Set a periodic sweep: listings drift out of date, and an aggregator showing your old pricing will outrank your own page for some queries.

Sources

references/sources.md in this skill lists the outside authorities that settle the questions here — what each one is authoritative for, and what you may do with it. Check them before answering on anything they cover, and cite what you used. Most are free to read and not free to reproduce; the use note on each is binding.

Never

  • List everywhere available. Directories with no traffic cost maintenance and dilute nothing but your attention.
  • Let listing copy drift from the positioning of record. Every stale listing is a competing description of the product.
  • Solicit reviews only after a customer complains, or only from customers you know are happy. Both distort the signal you are buying.

Discussion

No comments yet — start the thread.

Sign in to join the discussion.

/More from cbrock84/headcount

cbrock84· 7d agoCommunity
chief-strategy-officer

Prompts · Markdown · v0.1.0

Owns where the business plays and how it wins over a multi-year horizon — portfolio choices, corporate development, strategic partnerships, and planning under uncertainty. Use this for a decision about which markets or businesses to be in, whether to build, buy, or partner, how to allocate capital across business lines, or when a long-horizon bet needs framing. Distinct from `chief-executive`, which arbitrates present-quarter conflicts.

#agent-marketplace#chatgpt-plugin#chatgpt-skills

0 1.7K
cbrock84· 7d agoCommunity
market-entry

Prompts · Markdown · v0.1.0

Decides whether and how to enter a new market — sizing demand from the bottom up rather than from a market report, testing whether your advantage transfers, choosing between organic entry, partnership and acquisition, sequencing the operational and regulatory work that entry actually requires, and setting the criteria that would tell you to stop. Use this to evaluate a new geography, segment or vertical, pressure-test an entry plan, or work out why a launched market never reached scale.

#agent-marketplace#chatgpt-plugin#chatgpt-skills

0 1.7K
cbrock84· 7d agoCommunity
mergers-and-acquisitions

Prompts · Markdown · v0.1.0

Runs corporate development — deal thesis, target screening, valuation framing, diligence, and integration planning. Use this when considering an acquisition or being approached about one, when evaluating build-versus-buy at company scale, when running or reviewing diligence, or when planning how an acquired business will actually be integrated.

#agent-marketplace#chatgpt-plugin#chatgpt-skills

0 1.7K
cbrock84· 7d agoCommunity
portfolio-strategy

Prompts · Markdown · v0.1.0

Decides where capital and attention go across business lines, products, and markets — what to fund, hold, harvest, or exit, and on what evidence. Use this to allocate budget across businesses, evaluate whether a product line should continue, decide whether to exit one, structure a portfolio review, or when several initiatives compete for the same limited investment.

#agent-marketplace#chatgpt-plugin#chatgpt-skills

0 1.7K