/Catalogue/Prompt/code-yeongyu/code-yeongyu-oh-my-openagent-git-master

Origin: github

git-master

Handles git work: atomic commits, rebase, squash, blame, bisect, reflog, and history questions. Use whenever a task needs a commit or a git-history investigation; skip for ordinary code edits.

by code-yeongyu · updated 15h ago · imported from GitHub

Installs0+0/7d
Security score73/100
Retention 14d0%
GitHub stars69.4K

Skill logic

Execution graph
User message
Prompt rewrites behaviour
Response

SKILL.md

View on GitHub ↗

Git Master

Use this skill when the user asks you to operate on Git history or answer a Git-history question. Be exact, conservative, and evidence-led. Read the repository state before you infer anything.

Mode Gate

Classify the request first:

  • COMMIT: stage and commit local changes.
  • REBASE: rebase, squash, fixup, autosquash, reorder, split, or otherwise rewrite branch history.
  • HISTORY: answer when, where, who, why, or which commit changed something.
  • STATUS: inspect branch, diff, or working-tree state without changing it.

Do not commit, rebase, push, force-push, reset, stash-pop, or delete anything unless the user explicitly asked for that operation. If the request is only investigative, report findings and stop.

Ground Truth

Gather independent facts in parallel when the tools allow it:

git status --short
git diff --stat
git diff --staged --stat
git branch --show-current
git log -30 --oneline
git log -30 --pretty=format:%s
git rev-parse --abbrev-ref @{upstream}
git merge-base HEAD origin/main
git merge-base HEAD origin/master

Missing upstream or missing main/master is normal. Fall back to the best available branch or report the missing fact. Never treat a failed lookup as proof.

PR Body Evidence Attachments

When a PR body needs screenshots or terminal PNGs, use the repo reference at docs/reference/github-attachment-upload.md. The allowed hosting path is GitHub user attachments from the authenticated web attachment flow; never commit temporary images, never use GitHub Releases for PR evidence, and never use external image hosts. Do not log browser cookies, CSRF tokens, S3 form fields, or upload headers.

Commit Mode

Commit only the user's requested changes. Preserve unrelated dirty work.

  1. Detect message style from recent history. Use the dominant local pattern, language, and casing. Do not default to Conventional Commits unless the repo uses them.
  2. Inspect the full diff, not only filenames. Separate unrelated user edits from the requested commit.
  3. Build atomic groups by behavior, module, and revertability. Keep implementation and its direct tests together.
  4. Prefer multiple commits for unrelated concerns. A single commit is acceptable only when the changed files form one indivisible behavior or the user explicitly asks for one commit.
  5. Stage by path or hunk so each commit contains only its atomic group.
  6. Before each commit, verify git diff --staged --stat and enough staged diff to prove the group is right.
  7. Commit with the detected style. After each commit, verify git log -1 --oneline.

Grouping rules:

  • Split different features, modules, generated artifacts, config, docs, and test-only changes unless they are inseparable.
  • Keep generated files with the source change that produced them when omitting them would leave the repo inconsistent.
  • Never hide failing or unrelated changes inside a broad commit.

Final report: list commit hashes, messages, and any remaining uncommitted files.

Rebase Mode

History rewriting is a shared-impact operation.

  • Never rebase or rewrite main, master, dev, release branches, or a protected branch unless the user explicitly named that exact operation.
  • If commits may already be pushed, ask before force-pushing. Use --force-with-lease, never plain --force.
  • If the worktree is dirty, preserve it intentionally before rebasing. Do not stash-pop over conflicts without checking what changed.
  • For fixups, prefer git commit --fixup=<hash> followed by GIT_SEQUENCE_EDITOR=: git rebase -i --autosquash <base>.
  • For conflicts, read the conflicting files and resolve by intent. Do not choose ours/theirs blindly.
  • If a rebase goes wrong, use git rebase --abort first. Use reflog only after explaining the recovery path.

After rewriting, run the relevant tests or at least the project's cheapest smoke check, then show the new branch log from base to HEAD.

History Mode

Choose the Git tool by the question:

  • git log -S "text": when the count of an exact string changed.
  • git log -G "regex": when diffs touched lines matching a pattern.
  • git blame -L start,end -- file: who last changed specific lines.
  • git log --follow -- file: history across renames for one file.
  • git show <hash>: inspect the commit that appears relevant.
  • git bisect: find the first bad commit when there is a deterministic pass/fail command and known good/bad bounds.
  • git reflog: recover or explain recent local history movement.

Always cite the exact command evidence in the answer: commit hash, subject, file path, and line or diff context when relevant. If the evidence is ambiguous, say what remains unproven.

Safety Checks

Before any write to Git history:

  • Current branch is known.
  • Dirty work is accounted for.
  • Upstream/pushed status is known or explicitly unknown.
  • The operation matches the user's request.
  • Recovery path is known (rebase --abort, reflog hash, or untouched worktree).

Before finishing:

  • Run the most relevant verification available for the changed behavior or history operation.
  • Report commands that passed and any command you could not run.
  • Leave the worktree state explicit.

Discussion

No comments yet — start the thread.

Sign in to join the discussion.

/More from code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent

code-yeongyu· 15h agoSandbox
hyperplan

Prompts · TypeScript · v0.1.0

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', 'adversarial plan', 'hostile planning', 'cross-critique plan', '하이퍼플랜', '적대적 계획', '교차 비평'.

#ai#ai-agents#anthropic

0 69.4K
code-yeongyu· 15h agoSandbox
hyperplan

Prompts · TypeScript · v0.1.0

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', 'adversarial plan', 'hostile planning', 'cross-critique plan', '하이퍼플랜', '적대적 계획', '교차 비평'.

#ai#ai-agents#anthropic

0 69.4K
code-yeongyu· 15h agoSandbox
pre-publish-review

Prompts · TypeScript · v0.1.0

Nuclear-grade 12-agent pre-publish release gate. Runs /get-unpublished-changes to detect all changes since last npm release, spawns up to 10 ultrabrain agents for deep per-change analysis, invokes /review-work (orchestrator manual QA plus one gate reviewer) for holistic review, and 1 oracle for overall release synthesis. Runs ONLY when the user explicitly asks for a pre-publish review — a plain publish/release request MUST NOT trigger this; /publish ships directly. Triggers: 'pre-publish review', 'review before publish', 'release review', 'pre-release review', 'ready to publish?', 'can I publish?', 'pre-publish', 'safe to publish', 'publishing review', 'pre-publish check'.

#ai#ai-agents#anthropic

0 69.4K
code-yeongyu· 15h agoSandbox
codex-qa

Prompts · TypeScript · v0.1.0

QA the omo Codex Light edition (lazycodex / packages/omo-codex) itself, in strict isolation so ONLY our plugin is exercised, never the user's real ~/.codex. The first-party method drives the real `codex app-server` against an isolated CODEX_HOME plus a LOCAL mock model (no real API call), and proves a plugin hook fired by asserting hook/started + hook/completed notifications. Also: isolated install verification, per-component hook probes, a tmux TUI smoke, and runtime log observation (RUST_LOG / logs SQLite / /debug-config). Ships tested helper scripts each with a --self-test. Use whenever someone changes anything under packages/omo-codex or wants to QA, smoke-test, verify, or debug the Codex plugin, its hooks/components, the installer/config.toml, the app-server flow, or the Codex TUI. Triggers: codex qa, qa codex, codex-qa, test codex plugin, verify codex hook, codex app-server, lazycodex qa, isolated CODEX_HOME, prove codex hook fired, codex tui test.

#ai#ai-agents#anthropic

0 69.4K