/Catalogue/Prompt/elementalsouls/elementalsouls-claude-bughunter-hunt-forgot-password

Origin: github

hunt-forgot-password

Hunt Forgot Password / Account Recovery Authentication Flaws — 5 distinct patterns: (1) username enumeration via different responses for valid vs invalid email, (2) reset token exposed directly in the API response body, (3) reset token not invalidated after use (replay), (4) password reset link works from a different IP/browser (no binding), (5) no rate limit on the reset request endpoint. These are the standalone recovery-flow broken-auth primitives — distinct from reset-email host-header poisoning (hunt-host-header) and the full ATO chain (hunt-ato owns password-reset as an ATO path; prove the primitive here, chain it there). Detection: trace the full forgot-password flow from request to token to use; check response diffs between valid/invalid emails; test token replay after consumption. Medium to High (enumeration=Medium, token-reuse=High, account-takeover=Critical when chained to known-email).

by elementalsouls · updated 6h ago · imported from GitHub

Installs0+0/7d
Security score100/100
Retention 14d0%
GitHub stars4.7K

Skill logic

Execution graph
User message
Prompt rewrites behaviour
Response

SKILL.md

View on GitHub ↗

Autonomous Testing Priority

Start with username enumeration — it's the fastest win and gates the rest.

Pattern 1 — Username enumeration (response difference for valid vs invalid email):

  1. POST to the forgot-password endpoint with a clearly invalid email (e.g. nonexistent@fakedomain12345.com) — record the response body, status code, and length
  2. POST with an email you know exists (or try common patterns like admin@target.com, test@target.com, user@target.com)
  3. Compare responses: different message ("Email sent" vs "Email not found"), different HTTP status, or meaningfully different body length = username enumeration confirmed
  4. Proof: enumeration is confirmed when the two responses differ measurably (baseline vs probe) in message text, status code, or body length

Pattern 2 — Reset token exposed in the API response: Some APIs return the reset token directly in the response body (instead of only emailing it). POST to the forgot-password endpoint and look for a token, link, or code in the JSON/HTML response. If a token appears that lets you reset the password, that's an immediate account-takeover vector.

Pattern 3 — Reset token replay (reuse after use):

  1. Complete a full password reset cycle: request token → use it to reset password
  2. Immediately try submitting the same token again to the reset-password endpoint
  3. If the second submission returns 200 or "success" → token not invalidated after use

Pattern 4 — No rate limit on reset requests: Submit the forgot-password endpoint 10-20 times rapidly with the same email. If all succeed without a 429, lockout, or CAPTCHA → no rate limit (enumeration + token flooding is possible).

Content-type: Forgot-password endpoints are often JSON-based REST APIs. Use application/x-www-form-urlencoded only if the endpoint is a traditional HTML form (check the login page's HTML to determine form encoding).

Proof: Username enumeration = measurably different response (body/status/length). Token exposure = token in response body. Token replay = second successful use of a consumed token.


Vulnerability Classes in This Skill

1. Username Enumeration via Password Reset

Different error messages for valid vs invalid accounts leaks the user list without authentication. Even timing differences (fast "no user found" vs slow "email queued") count.

High-value targets: admin accounts, employee email patterns, API keys derived from usernames.

2. Weak / Predictable Reset Tokens

A reset token derived from timestamp, username, or sequential IDs can be brute-forced:

  • base64(email + timestamp) — decodable
  • 4-6 digit numeric code — 10K guesses, easily feasible with no rate limit
  • Sequential token=1234, token=1235 — trivially enumerable

3. Token Not Bound to Session or IP

Most apps generate a token, email it, and accept it from any browser. A truly bound token should only work from the same IP or require the original session cookie. If neither is enforced → link forwarding = account takeover.

Token leak via Referer / third-party resources. When the token rides in the reset-page URL (/reset?token=…) and that page loads any cross-origin resource (analytics, ads, fonts, a CDN image), the full URL — token included — leaks to that third party in the Referer header. Check the reset page's outbound requests: if the token appears in any cross-origin Referer, it's harvestable without the victim's inbox. Same leak via a <meta name=referrer> misconfig or an outbound link the victim clicks from the reset page. Disclosed token-leak→ATO class: https://hackerone.com/reports/173551.

4. Reset Link Doesn't Expire

Common best practice: reset tokens expire within ~15–60 minutes (no hard RFC mandates the exact value; OWASP recommends a short, single-use lifetime). If a token from 24 hours ago still works → persistence risk for phishing attacks.

5. No Rate Limit on Reset Endpoint

An uncapped reset endpoint enables:

  • Email flooding (DoS against victim's inbox)
  • Token brute-force if the token space is small
  • Username enumeration at scale

Related Skills

  • hunt-ato — owns the account-takeover CHAIN (password-reset is its path #1). This skill finds/proves the recovery-flow primitive; hand off to hunt-ato to assemble the full takeover.
  • hunt-cache-poison — host-header injection during reset email generation (different vulnerability, same flow)
  • hunt-brute-force — rate-limit testing pattern applies to the reset endpoint too
  • hunt-auth-bypass — if the reset flow can be skipped entirely (go to /reset-password?token= with empty/null token)
  • hunt-mfa-bypass — if MFA is required after reset, test the bypass there

Discussion

No comments yet — start the thread.

Sign in to join the discussion.

/More from elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter

elementalsouls· 6h agoCommunity
hunt-business-logic

Prompts · Python · v0.1.0

Hunting skill for business logic vulnerabilities. Built from 12 public bug bounty reports. Covers coupon-race-stacking (Instacart, Stripe, Reverb), negative-quantity-in-cart price tampering (Upserve, Eternal/Zomato), decimal/fraction price-field overflow (Shipt), client-side checkout amount trust on PayPal redirect (WordPress.org), price-per-unit mass-assignment (Krisp), and archived-price swap / cart-TOCTOU (Stripe). Use when hunting business logic — heavy emphasis on financial-impact-demonstrated cases.

#ai-security#anthropic#application-security

0 4.7K
elementalsouls· 6h agoCommunity
hunt-cache-poison

Prompts · Python · v0.1.0

Hunting skill for cache poison vulnerabilities. Built from 10 public bug bounty reports including X-Forwarded-Host poisoning, X-HTTP-Method-Override / GCS cache, reflected→stored XSS via cache, classic Omer-Gil Web Cache Deception, Cloudflare Cache Deception Armor bypass, session-token cache deception, Akamai hop-by-hop smuggling → server-side edge poisoning, and Kettle's 2024 path-normalization WCD against Cloudflare/Fastly/GCP. Host/X-Forwarded-Host injection that reaches app logic (reset-link poisoning, routing SSRF, OAuth issuer) is owned by hunt-host-header; this skill owns the case where the poisoned response is CACHED and served to other users. Use when hunting cache poisoning, Web Cache Deception, CDN-fronted apps.

#ai-security#anthropic#application-security

0 4.7K
elementalsouls· 6h agoCommunity
hunt-captcha-bypass

Prompts · Python · v0.1.0

Hunt CAPTCHA Bypass — 6 distinct patterns: (1) CAPTCHA field simply omitted from the request (server-side validation absent), (2) CAPTCHA token replayed from a solved challenge (no single-use enforcement), (3) CAPTCHA response accepted on a different endpoint than it was solved on (no binding to action/session), (4) static or predictable CAPTCHA values accepted (e.g. '0', 'null', empty string), (5) audio/accessibility CAPTCHA trivially solvable programmatically, (6) CAPTCHA only enforced after N failures (first N requests bypass it). Detection: intercept a successful form submission, remove the CAPTCHA field entirely, replay — if it still succeeds, server-side validation is absent. Medium severity standalone; High when it removes the only rate-limit gate protecting a login, registration, or payment endpoint.

#ai-security#anthropic#application-security

0 4.7K
elementalsouls· 6h agoCommunity
hunt-clickjacking

Prompts · Python · v0.1.0

Hunt Clickjacking — missing X-Frame-Options / CSP frame-ancestors lets an attacker embed the target page in an invisible iframe and trick victims into clicking buttons they cannot see (UI redressing). Targets: login flows, money transfers, account settings, OAuth confirmation pages. Confirm by fetching the page, then PROVE it frames in a real browser and a sensitive state-changing action survives the cross-site context (SameSite cookies / framebusting JS can defeat it) — header-absence alone is not a finding.

#ai-security#anthropic#application-security

0 4.7K