/Catalogue/Prompt/irinabuht12-oss/irinabuht12-oss-marketing-skills-attribution-model-comparison

Origin: github

attribution-model-comparison

Runs your conversion data through different attribution models side by side — last click, first click, linear, time decay, position based, and data-driven. Shows you how credit shifts between campaigns depending on the model so you can make better budget decisions instead of over-investing in last-touch campaigns. Platform: Google and Meta.

by irinabuht12-oss · updated 1d ago · imported from GitHub

Installs0+0/7d
Security score98/100
Retention 14d0%
GitHub stars2K

Skill logic

Execution graph
User message
Prompt rewrites behaviour
Response

SKILL.md

View on GitHub ↗

26/ Attribution Model Comparison — Google + Meta

What it does

Runs your conversion data through different attribution models side by side — last click, first click, linear, time decay, position based, and data-driven. Shows you how credit shifts between campaigns depending on the model so you can make better budget decisions instead of over-investing in last-touch campaigns.

How it works

Claude takes your multi-touch conversion path data and applies each attribution model to the same dataset. It then compares how each campaign's attributed conversions and ROAS change under different models, highlighting campaigns that look great under last-click but contribute nothing at first-touch (and vice versa).

Practical example

Under last-click attribution, your Google Brand campaign gets credit for 420 conversions at $18 CPA, making it your "best" campaign. But when Claude runs first-click attribution, Brand drops to 31 conversions — most of those users actually discovered you through Meta prospecting (which jumps from 89 to 340 attributed conversions). Linear attribution puts Meta prospecting at 215 and Brand at 190, giving a more balanced picture. Claude recommends shifting 20% of Brand budget to Meta prospecting, which is actually originating most of your pipeline.

What you get back

  • Side-by-side conversion and ROAS comparison across all models for every campaign
  • Campaigns most affected by model choice (high variance = their role is misunderstood)
  • Upper-funnel campaigns being undervalued under last-click
  • Lower-funnel campaigns being over-credited under last-click
  • Budget reallocation recommendations based on a blended attribution view
  • Recommended "working model" for your specific account based on funnel length and touchpoint patterns

When to use it

  • When making budget allocation decisions to avoid last-click bias
  • During QBRs to show clients the full picture of campaign value
  • When upper-funnel campaigns are on the chopping block due to "poor" last-click ROAS
  • Before cutting any campaign that might be silently feeding conversions elsewhere

Data access (Ryze MCP)

This skill works best with live account data. Connect the free Ryze MCP once and Claude reads your Google Ads, Meta Ads, GA4 and Search Console directly:

  • claude.ai / Claude Desktop: Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector → https://connector.get-ryze.ai/mcp
  • Claude Code: claude mcp add ryze --transport http https://connector.get-ryze.ai/mcp
  • Cursor: Settings → MCP → add the same URL

Setup guide: https://www.get-ryze.ai/how-to-connect-claude-to-google-meta-ads-mcp

Discussion

No comments yet — start the thread.

Sign in to join the discussion.

/More from irinabuht12-oss/marketing-skills

irinabuht12-oss· 1d agoCommunity
ab-test-analyzer

Prompts · v0.1.0

Statistical significance calculator for A/B test results with sample size requirements, segment breakdowns, and hypothesis generation. Use when feeding test results, checking statistical significance, calculating sample sizes, analyzing experiment outcomes, or generating next test ideas based on results. Platform: Google and Meta.

#ai-visibility#claude-code#claude-desktop

0 2K
irinabuht12-oss· 1d agoCommunity

Designs statistically valid split tests for ads, audiences, landing pages, or bid strategies. Calculates required sample sizes before you start, monitors results during the test, and calls winners when statistical significance is actually reached — not when you feel like one is winning. Platform: Google and Meta.

#ai-visibility#claude-code#claude-desktop

0 2K
irinabuht12-oss· 1d agoCommunity
account-structure-review

Prompts · v0.1.0

Evaluates your campaign and ad set structure against your actual goals and budget. Flags over-segmentation that fragments your data, under-segmentation that hides performance differences, budget allocation issues, and consolidation opportunities that would improve algorithmic delivery and your ability to optimize. Platform: Google and Meta.

#ai-visibility#claude-code#claude-desktop

0 2K
irinabuht12-oss· 1d agoCommunity
ad-copy-variant-generator

Prompts · v0.1.0

Analyzes your top performing ads, identifies what's working in the hooks, CTAs, messaging angles, and formats, then generates new variants that follow the same winning patterns while introducing enough variation to test meaningfully. Platform: Google and Meta.

#ai-visibility#claude-code#claude-desktop

0 2K