/Catalogue/Prompt/irinabuht12-oss/irinabuht12-oss-marketing-skills-competitor-teardown

Origin: github

competitor-teardown

Systematic competitive analysis covering positioning, messaging hierarchy, objection handling, and CTA strategy from landing page URLs or screenshots. Use when pasting a competitor URL, uploading competitor screenshots, requesting positioning analysis, or needing to understand competitive messaging and differentiation strategies. Platform: Google and Meta.

by irinabuht12-oss · updated 1d ago · imported from GitHub

Installs0+0/7d
Security score98/100
Retention 14d0%
GitHub stars2K

Skill logic

Execution graph
User message
Prompt rewrites behaviour
Response

SKILL.md

View on GitHub ↗

Competitor Teardown

Analyze competitor landing pages for positioning, messaging, and conversion strategy insights.

Process

  1. Capture the page - URL for fetch or screenshot upload
  2. Extract value proposition - Problem, ICP, transformation, unique mechanism
  3. Map messaging hierarchy - Headline → Subheadline → Body → CTA flow
  4. Score systematically - 100-point rubric
  5. Identify strengths and weaknesses - Actionable competitive intelligence
  6. Generate strategic recommendations - How to differentiate

Value Proposition Analysis Framework

Answer these four questions from the competitor's page:

QuestionWhat to Look For
What problem do they solve?Pain points mentioned, problem agitation
Who is their ICP?Language cues, industry references, company size signals
What transformation do they promise?Before/after, outcomes, results
What's their unique mechanism?Proprietary method, technology, approach

Messaging Hierarchy Evaluation

ElementAssessment Criteria
HeadlineMatches intent? Clear benefit? Addresses pain? Most prominent?
SubheadlineExpands "how"? Reinforces UVP? Supports headline?
Body CopyFramework used (AIDA/PAS/BAB)? Benefit-to-feature ratio?
CTAVisible? Action-oriented verb? Value stated? Urgency present?
Trust SignalsLogos, testimonials, ratings, certifications, social proof?

100-Point Scoring Rubric

CategoryMax PointsScoring Criteria
Positioning Clarity15Clear problem/solution, obvious ICP, differentiation
Headline Effectiveness15Benefit-driven, specific, compelling
Copy Quality15Benefit-focused, scannable, persuasive
CTA Strategy15Visible, action-oriented, low friction
Trust Signals10Quality social proof, credibility markers
Visual Hierarchy10Clear flow, emphasis on key elements
Objection Handling10FAQ, guarantees, risk reversals
Pricing Presentation5Clear, justified, anchored
Brand Voice5Consistent, appropriate, memorable

Red Flags to Identify

  • Vague headlines ("The best solution for your needs")
  • Feature-heavy copy without benefits
  • Multiple audiences addressed on single page
  • Missing or buried value proposition
  • Weak or generic CTAs ("Submit," "Learn More")
  • No social proof or trust signals
  • Cluttered design with competing elements

Output Format

## Competitor Teardown: [Company Name]

**URL**: [URL]
**Analysis Date**: [Date]
**Overall Score**: [X/100]

### Value Proposition Analysis
- **Problem Solved**: [Description]
- **Target ICP**: [Description]
- **Promised Transformation**: [Description]
- **Unique Mechanism**: [Description or "Not clearly stated"]

### Messaging Hierarchy
| Element | Content | Effectiveness |
|---------|---------|---------------|
| Headline | "[Quote]" | [Score]/10 - [Assessment] |
| Subheadline | "[Quote]" | [Score]/10 |
| Primary CTA | "[Quote]" | [Score]/10 |

### Scoring Breakdown
| Category | Score | Notes |
|----------|-------|-------|
| Positioning Clarity | /15 | |
| Headline Effectiveness | /15 | |
| Copy Quality | /15 | |
| CTA Strategy | /15 | |
| Trust Signals | /10 | |
| Visual Hierarchy | /10 | |
| Objection Handling | /10 | |
| Pricing Presentation | /5 | |
| Brand Voice | /5 | |
| **TOTAL** | **/100** | |

### Strengths (What to Learn)
1. [Strength with specific example]
2. [Strength with specific example]

### Weaknesses (Opportunities to Beat Them)
1. [Weakness with specific example]
2. [Weakness with specific example]

### Strategic Recommendations
1. [How to differentiate against this competitor]
2. [Messaging angle they're not using]

### Confidence Level: [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW]

Example

Input: "Analyze notion.so homepage"

Output:

## Competitor Teardown: Notion

**Overall Score**: 78/100

### Value Proposition Analysis
- **Problem Solved**: Fragmented tools for notes, docs, wikis, projects
- **Target ICP**: Knowledge workers, teams, startups
- **Promised Transformation**: One workspace for all work
- **Unique Mechanism**: Flexible blocks system, templates

### Messaging Hierarchy
| Element | Content | Effectiveness |
|---------|---------|---------------|
| Headline | "Write, plan, organize, play" | 7/10 - Broad but memorable |
| Subheadline | "Turn ideas into action with Notion's AI-powered workspace" | 8/10 - Clear value |
| Primary CTA | "Get Notion free" | 9/10 - Low friction, value-focused |

### Strengths
1. **Social proof**: Trusted by logos prominent above fold
2. **Low-friction entry**: Free tier CTA reduces conversion resistance

### Weaknesses
1. **Vague headline**: Doesn't communicate specific outcome
2. **Broad ICP**: Page tries to speak to everyone

### Strategic Recommendations
1. Position against their broadness - own a specific use case deeply
2. Lead with concrete outcomes vs features

### Confidence Level: HIGH

Guidelines

  • If given screenshot only, note any sections not visible
  • Extract exact quotes for messaging analysis
  • Compare to best practices, not just personal opinion
  • Always provide actionable differentiation strategies
  • If URL inaccessible, ask for screenshot or describe limitations

Data access (Ryze MCP)

This skill works best with live account data. Connect the free Ryze MCP once and Claude reads your Google Ads, Meta Ads, GA4 and Search Console directly:

  • claude.ai / Claude Desktop: Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector → https://connector.get-ryze.ai/mcp
  • Claude Code: claude mcp add ryze --transport http https://connector.get-ryze.ai/mcp
  • Cursor: Settings → MCP → add the same URL

Setup guide: https://www.get-ryze.ai/how-to-connect-claude-to-google-meta-ads-mcp

Discussion

No comments yet — start the thread.

Sign in to join the discussion.

/More from irinabuht12-oss/marketing-skills

irinabuht12-oss· 1d agoCommunity
ab-test-analyzer

Prompts · v0.1.0

Statistical significance calculator for A/B test results with sample size requirements, segment breakdowns, and hypothesis generation. Use when feeding test results, checking statistical significance, calculating sample sizes, analyzing experiment outcomes, or generating next test ideas based on results. Platform: Google and Meta.

#ai-visibility#claude-code#claude-desktop

0 2K
irinabuht12-oss· 1d agoCommunity

Designs statistically valid split tests for ads, audiences, landing pages, or bid strategies. Calculates required sample sizes before you start, monitors results during the test, and calls winners when statistical significance is actually reached — not when you feel like one is winning. Platform: Google and Meta.

#ai-visibility#claude-code#claude-desktop

0 2K
irinabuht12-oss· 1d agoCommunity
account-structure-review

Prompts · v0.1.0

Evaluates your campaign and ad set structure against your actual goals and budget. Flags over-segmentation that fragments your data, under-segmentation that hides performance differences, budget allocation issues, and consolidation opportunities that would improve algorithmic delivery and your ability to optimize. Platform: Google and Meta.

#ai-visibility#claude-code#claude-desktop

0 2K
irinabuht12-oss· 1d agoCommunity
ad-copy-variant-generator

Prompts · v0.1.0

Analyzes your top performing ads, identifies what's working in the hooks, CTAs, messaging angles, and formats, then generates new variants that follow the same winning patterns while introducing enough variation to test meaningfully. Platform: Google and Meta.

#ai-visibility#claude-code#claude-desktop

0 2K