/Catalogue/Prompt/reticlehq/reticlehq-reticle-debug-broken-ui

Origin: github

debug-broken-ui

Find out why something in a running web app does not work, when the console is empty and the code looks correct. Reads the click, the request, the store and the console together and returns the file:line to open. Use when a button does nothing, a form will not submit, data will not load, a page renders blank or stale, a modal will not close, or the user says "it's broken" and the code review says it is fine.

by reticlehq · updated 4h ago · imported from GitHub

Installs0+0/7d
Security score100/100
Retention 14d0%
GitHub stars851

Skill logic

Execution graph
User message
Prompt rewrites behaviour
Response

SKILL.md

View on GitHub ↗

The app is broken and the code looks fine

Reading the source again will not tell you why. The evidence is in the running app, and most of it never reaches the screen: the request that failed, the store that never moved, the handler that was never bound, the element covered by something invisible.

Reticle reads all of it from inside the page. Not installed? RETICLE_INSTALL_SOURCE=npx_skill npx @reticlehq/server@latest init, then the install-and-verify skill.

Do not start by guessing. Start by reproducing.

reticle_look({ action: "page", sessionId, mode: "interactive" })   // controls only, with refs
reticle_act_and_wait({ sessionId, ref, action: "click", until: { kind: "element", query: { testid: "..." } } })

The verdict already narrows it: no / contradicted means a channel saw something incompatible with the UI: you have the bug. unknown means Reticle drove it and could not tell, which is a different investigation from "it failed".

Read the act result before you call anything else. Its summary block already carries the whole causal window of that one click: net {total, errors, headline}, consoleErrors, stateDiffs [{path, from, to}], storageDiffs [{key, from, to}], route, signals, layoutShift, longTasks: real before→after diffs, not counts. The console, network, storage and state calls below are for going DEEPER into something the summary already pointed at. Calling all three straight after an act pays three model round trips (and, in an approval-gated client, three human clicks) for evidence you were already holding.

summary.stateUnwatched: true means the state channel is dark: no subscribable store is registered, so an empty stateDiffs means unwatched, not unchanged, and no state-based conclusion is available until someone registers the store. It is the one field here that is about your instrumentation rather than about the app.

When the summary does point somewhere, read that channel scoped to what you just did: pass since from the act result, or you are reading a buffer that predates the click:

reticle_observe({ action: "console", sessionId, since })
reticle_observe({ action: "network", sessionId, since })
reticle_look({ action: "state", sessionId, store })

The diagnosis table

What you seeWhat it isNext
No request fired at allthe handler is not bound, or a client cache served a stale valuereticle_look { action: "element" } the element for its file:line; check the cache if it is TanStack Query
Request fired, 4xx/5xxa real backend failure the UI swallowedthe response body is in the network entry
2xx but nothing changedthe app never read the response: verdict says outcome_unreadusually a real bug in the success path
Request fine, DOM fine, store staleUI-vs-state desync, invisible to any screenshotreticle_look { action: "state" } is the only witness; this is the highest-value read here
Click did nothing, no errorthe control is dead, occluded, or disabledreticle_look { action: "element" } returns occluded, box (0×0), styles.cursor, opacity
Element "not found" that you can seevirtualised list has not mounted itreticle_scroll_to. A query that misses is not evidence of absence
Looks logged in, behaves logged outthe token never persistedreticle_storage
Console error that predates your clicka pre-existing fault, not your bugcall it out before continuing

Get the file, not a theory

reticle_look({ action: "element", sessionId, ref })

Returns the component and source: { file, line } for the element you are looking at, plus whether it is occluded, sized, disabled or off-theme. That is the pointer to open. End the investigation with a location, not a hypothesis.

When the flow is long

Do not ping-pong act → snapshot → act → snapshot to find the failing step. Drive the journey with reticle_act { steps: [...] } and assert once; the first step whose consequence fails is the one to look at, and you paid a fraction of the calls to find it.

Before you say it is fixed

Re-run the reproduction as a verdict (reticle_act_and_wait with the consequence named up front) rather than eyeballing the page. A fix confirmed by looking at it is the failure mode that created this ticket.

And never weaken the check to make it pass.


Troubleshooting Reticle itself (as opposed to the app): curl https://docs.reticle.sh/troubleshooting.md. Everything else: curl https://docs.reticle.sh/llms.txt. If Reticle could not see something you needed, reticle_session { action: "feedback" } with kind: "gap".

Discussion

No comments yet — start the thread.

Sign in to join the discussion.

/More from reticlehq/reticle

reticlehq· 4h agoSandbox
reticle

Prompts · TypeScript · v0.1.0

Reticle embeds a dev-only SDK in the user's running app and exposes it to you as `reticle_*` MCP tools. You look, act, observe, and assert against the real app. No screenshots, and no browser download for the verify loop: it drives the tab the user already has open.

#agent-skill#agent-skills#agent-testing

0 851
reticlehq· 4h agoCommunity
reticle

Prompts · TypeScript · v0.1.0

Install, instrument and verify this running web app from the inside (DOM, network, routing, console and framework state) instead of screenshots or guessing. Drives one real flow end to end and returns a verdict with the file:line to fix. Use when the user asks to set up or install Reticle, when a user-facing change needs proving before you call it done, when a test passes but the UI is broken, or when the user types /reticle.

#agent-skill#agent-skills#agent-testing

0 851
reticlehq· 4h agoCommunity
agentic-tdd

Prompts · TypeScript · v0.1.0

Test-driven development for behaviour a unit test cannot reach, by writing the expectation against the running app before writing the code. Declare the consequence first, watch it fail, implement, watch it pass. Use when building a user-facing feature, when the user asks for TDD on UI or full-stack work, when a unit test cannot express the outcome that matters, or when you want a red-green loop that runs against the real app instead of mocks.

#agent-skill#agent-skills#agent-testing

0 851
reticlehq· 4h agoCommunity
audit-my-app

Prompts · TypeScript · v0.1.0

Sweep a whole running web app for what is broken, without writing a script or knowing the codebase. Clicks every reachable control and reports dead buttons, console errors, failed requests, and places where the API and the screen disagree. Use on an unfamiliar codebase, before a release, after a big merge or dependency bump, when the user asks for a smoke test or a health check, or when someone says "just check everything still works".

#agent-skill#agent-skills#agent-testing

0 851