/Catalogue/Prompt/reticlehq/reticlehq-reticle-verify-ui-change

Origin: github

verify-ui-change

Check that a change to a web app actually works in the running app before calling it done. Drives the real page and returns a pass/fail verdict with the request that fired, the state that moved, and the file:line to fix. Use after editing a component, a form, a route, or an API call; when you have said "fixed" but have not opened the app; when the user asks "does it actually work?"; or when a change looks right on screen and you cannot prove it.

by reticlehq · updated 4h ago · imported from GitHub

Installs0+0/7d
Security score100/100
Retention 14d0%
GitHub stars851

Skill logic

Execution graph
User message
Prompt rewrites behaviour
Response

SKILL.md

View on GitHub ↗

Verify the change in the running app

You edited something a user can see. Nothing is proven until the real app has done it and something other than the DOM agrees.

This uses Reticle, which embeds a dev-only SDK in the user's running app and exposes it as reticle_* MCP tools. No screenshots, no browser download for the verify loop, no dev server of its own.

1. Are the tools here?

reticle_session({ action: "list" })
  • A session comes back → go to step 2.
  • Tools do not exist → Reticle is not installed. Run RETICLE_INSTALL_SOURCE=npx_skill npx @reticlehq/server@latest init, then keep going without the tools: fix every ⚠ it printed, start the project's own dev script in the background if nothing is serving the app, and open it with npx @reticlehq/server open <the url the dev server is serving>. Only once the app is running and connected, ask for the one thing you cannot do yourself: a client restart, so it picks up the MCP server. Stopping at the init command leaves the user with config files and an uninstrumented page. Full setup is in the install-and-verify skill.
  • Tools exist, list is empty → read the why field on the response. It distinguishes "no app running" from "an app is running that never dialled this daemon" from "a tab was here and closed", and each has a different fix. If no app is running, start the project's own dev script from package.json in the background yourself and tell the user in one line that it is running and how to stop it: never a second one, never a guessed command, never kill anything, and the permission prompt is your host's. If one IS running, the app is not the missing piece and the SDK is; do not send the user to start what they already started.

2. Name the consequence BEFORE you act

This is the whole method. An expectation written after you see the result can be talked into agreeing with whatever happened; one written before cannot.

reticle_look({ action: "page", sessionId, mode: "interactive" })   // controls only, with refs

reticle_act_and_wait({ sessionId, ref, action: "click", until: { kind: "allOf", predicates: [
  { kind: "net",     method: "POST", urlContains: "/api/...", status: 200 },
  { kind: "element", query: { testid: "..." } },
  { kind: "console", level: "error", absent: true },
]}})

Multi-step journey? Drive it in one call with reticle_act { steps: [...] }, then assert the outcome once. Do not act → snapshot → act → snapshot: it proves the same thing at several times the cost.

Only reticle_act_and_wait and reticle_assert produce a verdict. reticle_act, snapshot, query, navigate, network and console move or read the app and prove nothing. A drive that ends without one of the first two has no result, however many calls it made.

3. Read the verdict honestly

verifiedmeansdo
yesthe consequence you named happenedreport it, with the evidence
noit did not happen, or a channel contradicted the UIa real finding: report it with because
unknownReticle drove the app and could not tellnot a pass. Say unknown and say why

On unknown / unsettled, re-assert rather than re-driving: reticle_assert({ predicate, since, timeout_ms: 8000 }) using the since from the act result. Re-driving repeats a side effect that already happened.

Never weaken a check to turn a verdict green. An assertion edited until it passes proves nothing.

4. Check what you did not touch

reticle_run({ tool: "reticle_verify", sessionId, args: { action: "coverage" } })   // { total, exercised, untouched }

If untouched still holds controls your change affects, the drive is unfinished. One call, and it is the cheapest guard against reporting a pass over the half you never opened.

5. Report

State what you drove, what the verdict was, and the evidence: the request and status, the state that changed, the app's own signal. If something failed, reticle_look({ action: "element", sessionId, ref }) on the failing element gives the file:line: put it in the report.

Then reticle_session({ action: "yield", mode: "waiting" }) so the human's panel stops reading "live".


More detail, fetchable one page at a time: curl https://docs.reticle.sh/llms.txt for the index, then the single page you need (tools/act-and-wait.md, predicates.md, troubleshooting.md). If Reticle itself misbehaves, file it with reticle_session { action: "feedback" }: one call, then carry on.

Discussion

No comments yet — start the thread.

Sign in to join the discussion.

/More from reticlehq/reticle

reticlehq· 4h agoSandbox
reticle

Prompts · TypeScript · v0.1.0

Reticle embeds a dev-only SDK in the user's running app and exposes it to you as `reticle_*` MCP tools. You look, act, observe, and assert against the real app. No screenshots, and no browser download for the verify loop: it drives the tab the user already has open.

#agent-skill#agent-skills#agent-testing

0 851
reticlehq· 4h agoCommunity
reticle

Prompts · TypeScript · v0.1.0

Install, instrument and verify this running web app from the inside (DOM, network, routing, console and framework state) instead of screenshots or guessing. Drives one real flow end to end and returns a verdict with the file:line to fix. Use when the user asks to set up or install Reticle, when a user-facing change needs proving before you call it done, when a test passes but the UI is broken, or when the user types /reticle.

#agent-skill#agent-skills#agent-testing

0 851
reticlehq· 4h agoCommunity
agentic-tdd

Prompts · TypeScript · v0.1.0

Test-driven development for behaviour a unit test cannot reach, by writing the expectation against the running app before writing the code. Declare the consequence first, watch it fail, implement, watch it pass. Use when building a user-facing feature, when the user asks for TDD on UI or full-stack work, when a unit test cannot express the outcome that matters, or when you want a red-green loop that runs against the real app instead of mocks.

#agent-skill#agent-skills#agent-testing

0 851
reticlehq· 4h agoCommunity
audit-my-app

Prompts · TypeScript · v0.1.0

Sweep a whole running web app for what is broken, without writing a script or knowing the codebase. Clicks every reachable control and reports dead buttons, console errors, failed requests, and places where the API and the screen disagree. Use on an unfamiliar codebase, before a release, after a big merge or dependency bump, when the user asks for a smoke test or a health check, or when someone says "just check everything still works".

#agent-skill#agent-skills#agent-testing

0 851