/Catalogue/Prompt/SnailSploit/snailsploit-claude-red-offensive-initial-access

Origin: github

offensive-initial-access

## Metadata - **Skill Name**: initial-access - **Folder**: offensive-initial-access - **Source**: https://github.com/SnailSploit/offensive-checklist/blob/main/initial-access.md

by SnailSploit · updated 5d ago · imported from GitHub

Installs0+0/7d
Security score0/100
Retention 14d0%
GitHub stars6.9K

Skill logic

Execution graph
User message
Prompt rewrites behaviour
Response

SKILL.md

View on GitHub ↗

SKILL: Modern Initial Access

Metadata

Description

Initial access techniques checklist: phishing (spear/smishing), credential stuffing, exposed service exploitation, supply chain attacks, watering hole, VPN/RDP brute force, public-facing application exploitation. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK TA0001. Use when planning initial access phases of red team engagements.

Trigger Phrases

Use this skill when the conversation involves any of: initial access, phishing, spear phishing, credential stuffing, exposed service, supply chain, watering hole, VPN brute force, RDP attack, MITRE TA0001, initial foothold

Instructions for Claude

When this skill is active:

  1. Load and apply the full methodology below as your operational checklist
  2. Follow steps in order unless the user specifies otherwise
  3. For each technique, consider applicability to the current target/context
  4. Track which checklist items have been completed
  5. Suggest next steps based on findings

Full Methodology

Modern Initial Access

Introduction

Typical Initial Access Vectors

  • Email with malware attached/linked
    • Most attacks using attached malware won't work
    • Out of the box protection may not cover PDF, ISO, IMG, HTML, SVG, PPTM, PPSM, ACCDE
    • Most URL-based attacks do work
    • domain's reputation, age, category should be sound
    • domain should use https
    • limit number of GET elements and their names
    • use HTML Smuggling to evade
    • get your domain warmed up (send some legitimate emails first with no attachment and links)
    • Advanced attacks may involve delivering backdoored trusted applications (e.g., older Electron apps with V8 exploits) via phishing to bypass application control like WDAC.
  • Spear-phishing/ phishing / stealing valid credentials
    • Check your mail with Phishious before sending it to your victim
    • use decode-spam-headers to analyze returned SMTP headers
    • Be aware that default Microsoft Office settings now block macros in files downloaded from the internet (marked with MOTW). Success often requires significant social engineering to convince users to bypass these protections or using alternative delivery methods (e.g., containers that don't propagate MOTW, signed add-ins).
    • images and link increase spam score, be wary of it
    • don't use no-reply like usernames
    • send through GoPhis -> AWS SOCAT :587 -> smtp.gmail.com -> @target.com
    • link to websites on trusted domains, like cloud-facing resources
    • make sure your webserver blocks automated bots
  • Deep‑fake voice or video social‑engineering calls (help‑desk or executive impersonation) to obtain password resets or approve MFA prompts. Generative‑AI tools make cloning voices trivial.
  • Business Email Compromise (BEC) / OAuth consent phishing that targets finance or vendor‑portal users, yielding cloud‑token access even where MFA is enabled.
  • Malicious OneNote .one attachments and OneDrive "Add to Shortcut" abuse: embedded HTA/JS payloads bypass Office macro blocking and spread via cloud sync.
  • Excel blocks untrusted Internet-origin XLL add-ins by default (M365, 2023+). Smuggled XLLs inside containers may still be blocked once MOTW propagates.
  • Malicious browser extensions (Chrome, Edge, Firefox) delivered through fake Web Store listings; hijack session cookies or inject scripts into authenticated SaaS sessions.
  • attackers register malicious cloud apps and trick users into granting scopes, giving token-based access that bypasses MFA
  • Reusing stolen credentials against external single factor VPN, gateways, etc
  • Password Spraying against Office365, custom login pages, VPN gateways
  • Exposed RDP with weak credentials and lacking controls
  • Unpatched known vulnerable perimeter device, application bugs, default credentials, etc
  • Rarely HID-emulating USB sticks
  • WiFi Evil Twin -> Route WPA2 Enterprise -> NetNTLMv2 hash cracking -> authenticated network access -> Responder
  • Plugging into on-premises LAN -> Responder/mitm6/Ldaprelayx
  • SEO poisoning / paid‑search malvertising (e.g., fake PuTTY & WinSCP ads, dominant loader delivery 2024–25) and "quishing" PDFs whose QR codes redirect victims to mobile OAuth login pages
  • Consent‑/token‑phishing and Adversary‑in‑the‑Middle (AiTM) proxy kits that steal OAuth session cookies or proxy MFA (e.g., EvilProxy, Tycoon, Dadsec). These vectors bypass MFA by tricking users into granting access to rogue Azure AD / Google Workspace apps.
  • Supply‑chain compromise of developer ecosystems:
    • malicious NPM / PyPI typosquat packages
    • poisoned GitHub Actions or CI/CD secrets exfiltration
    • container‑registry deception (imageless Docker Hub repos or curl | bash installers).
    • First contact often occurs on developer workstations.
  • Mass‑exploited perimeter and edge‑device zero‑days (e.g., Ivanti Connect Secure (such as CVE-2023-46805, CVE-2024-21887), MOVEit Transfer (such as CVE-2023-34362), Citrix Bleed) enabling unauthenticated remote code execution before credentials come into play. Maintain a live "current CVEs exploited‑in‑the‑wild" table and apply virtual patching/WAF rules where upgrades lag.
  • Cloud & Kubernetes misconfigurations:
    • exposed S3 buckets allowing upload‑then‑execute objects
    • SSRF into EC2 IMDSv1 or GCP metadata to steal instance credentials
    • open Kubernetes API/Argo CD dashboards, and leaked Azure SAS tokens that grant cross‑tenant data extraction.
    • OIDC Workload Identity Federation exposed: stolen GKE/EKS service‑account tokens grant cross‑cluster privilege escalation.
    • AWS STS credentials embedded in shareable URLs (GetFederationToken, presigned S3, etc.) leak temporary keys to attackers.
  • Mobile initial‑access vectors:
    • smishing or WhatsApp/Telegram lures
    • QR‑code invoice/resumé phishing that lands on mobile browsers
    • rogue Mobile Device Management (MDM) enrolment profiles granting full device admin.
    • Passkey/WebAuthn phishing pages that spoof the biometric prompt to hijack FIDO sessions.
    • Sideload invitations via fake Apple TestFlight or Test Fairy links deliver malicious iOS/Android apps outside official store review.
  • Collaboration‑app abuse:
    • malicious Microsoft Teams/Slack/Discord apps with overbroad OAuth scopes
    • slash‑command token vacuum
    • SharePoint Framework (SPFx) app sideloading
    • Discord/Telegram CDN links hosting first‑stage binaries.
  • If WinRM over HTTPS (WinRMS, port 5986) is enabled (it's not by default) and its Channel Binding setting remains at the default "Relaxed", it becomes vulnerable to NTLM relay attacks. Relayed credentials (e.g., from coerced HTTP/SMB/LDAP) can grant RCE. Ironically, enabling WinRMS to "harden" a system by disabling HTTP WinRM (port 5985, which is relay-resistant due to internal encryption) can introduce this vulnerability. Key technical details:
    • Standard WinRM (port 5985) uses HTTP with SPNEGO; channel binding is enabled by default, so NTLM relay fails unless the attacker controls TLS.
    • WinRMS (port 5986) runs over HTTPS; if CbtHardeningLevel is not set to Strict, credentials can still be relayed despite TLS.
    • Channel Binding (CBT) can be set to None (disabled), Relaxed (optional), or Strict (required)
    • Mitigation: winrm set winrm/config/service/auth '@{CbtHardeningLevel="Strict"}'
    • Prefer Kerberos or certificate-based auth for WinRM; monitor and reduce NTLM usage.
  • Exploiting misconfigured Power Platform services (e.g., Power Apps with overly permissive shared connections or abusing Power Query for native SQL execution against on-prem data gateways).

Command & Control

  • Use a two-stage Mythic C2 as our command and control
  • Stage one should be lean and hard to detect, it would be used for situational awareness
    • Merlin for Linux (no upstream commits since 2023, still functional)
    • Poseidon + Apfell for macOS
    • Apollo in shellcode form for Windows
      • to get rid of apollo console
      • open it via detect-it-easy, select pe and uncheck readonly
      • then select WINDOWS_GUI in Subsystem inside IMAGE_OPTIONAL_HEADER
      • also notice apollo is a 32-bit executable
    • also checkout Nimplant or others
    • Nighthawk
  • Stage two should be in-memory, inline-execute and feature reach
    • Nighthawk, Cobalt Strike, etc

Exec/DLL to SHELLCODE

For detailed information on converting executables and DLLs to shellcode, including:

  • Embedding shellcode into loaders
  • Backdooring legitimate PE executables
  • Tools like Donut, sRDI, Pe2shc and Amber
  • Open-source shellcode loaders like ScareCrow and NimPackt-v1

See the Shellcode documentation.

EDR Evasion Techniques

For detailed information on EDR evasion techniques, including:

  • Malware Virtualization
  • API Unhooking
  • Early Cascade Injection
  • Killing Bit techniques
  • Call Stack Obfuscation
  • Sleep Obfuscation

See the EDR Evasion documentation

Modern CyberDefense Stack

  • Secure Email Gateway / Email Security
    • FireEye MX
    • Cisco Email Security
    • TrendMicro for Email
    • MS Defender for Office365
  • Secure Web Gateway
    • Symantec BlueCoat
    • PaloAlto Proxy
    • Zscaler
    • FireEye NX
  • Secure DNS
    • Cisco Umbrella
    • DNSFilter
    • Akamai Enterprise Threat Protector
  • AntiVirus
    • McAfee
    • ESET
    • Symantec
    • BitDefender
    • Kaspersky
  • EDR
    • CrowdStrike Falcon
    • MS Defender for Endpoint
    • SentinelOne
    • VMware Carbon Black

Defensive quick‑wins

  • Email/web controls
    • Enable Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Safe Links and Safe Attach (or vendor equivalent).
    • Block direct download of executable formats; detonate unknowns in sandbox.
  • Office hardening
    • Keep "Block macros from the Internet (MOTW)" enforced; prefer trusted locations.
    • Block XLL add‑ins, unsigned COM add‑ins, and legacy Excel 4.0 macros
    • ASR rules: Block Office child processes; Block Win32 API calls from Office; Block executable content from email and webmail; Block credential stealing from LSASS.
  • Browser/extension control
    • Enforce extension allowlists (Chrome/Edge/Firefox policy); disable developer mode on managed devices.
  • Identity & auth
    • Enforce MFA; restrict OAuth app consent (publisher verification + admin consent workflows); tenant restrictions.
    • Prefer phishing‑resistant MFA (FIDO2/CTAP); block legacy/basic auth; monitor device‑code flow abuse.
  • Endpoint policies
    • WDAC/Smart App Control or application allow‑listing for untrusted installers (MSI/MSIX/ClickOnce).
    • Monitor and restrict PowerShell Constrained Language Mode exceptions; log script block.
    • For WinRM: prefer Kerberos/certificate auth; set WinRMS channel binding to Strict: winrm set winrm/config/service/auth '@{CbtHardeningLevel="Strict"}'.

Security Controls Evasion

Perimeter Defense Evasion

Secure Web Gateway

  • sensitive on
    • Domain characteristics
    • URL-fetched contents (HTML, body, javascript)
    • MIME types (where file type is allowed or not)
  • can be evaded via
    • high reputation servers (cloud instances)
    • HTML smuggling

Secure DNS

  • sensitive on
    • Domain categorisation, maturity, whois examination
    • Presence on real-time blocking lists, threat intelligence feeds, virustotal-alike databases
    • SSL/TLS certificate contents
  • can be evaded via
    • high reputation domains (Domain fronting CDN like azure edge CDN, Cloud-based resources like AWS lambda or azure blob storage, personal cloud drives)
    • use Talos Intelligence to check reputation
    • AWS is dumber than Azure, use it

Endpoint Defense Evasion

Antivirus

  • sensitive on
    • static signatures
    • heuristic signatures
    • behavioural signatures
    • trigger events on-demand -> on-write -> on-access -> on-execute -> real-time
    • proactive protection of them is weaker due to low false-positive, low impact and high stability requirements
      • before-exec: mainly cloud-reputation based examination
      • before-exec: machine learning evaluation focusing on hand-picked characteristics
      • on-exec: simulating entry point and first N instructions
      • on-exec: memory scanner sweeping process virtual memory allocations for presence of signatured threats
    • steps
      • static analysis
      • heuristic analysis
      • cloud reputation analysis + automated sandboxing / detonation
      • ML analysis
      • emulation
      • behavioural analysis
  • can be evaded via
    • static analysis by writing custom malware
    • heuristic analysis by smartly blending-in with our payload
    • cloud reputation by backdooring legitimate binaries, devising malware in containers (PDF, Office docs), sticking to DLLs
    • automated sandboxing by environmental keying (only execute if something)
    • ML analysis by trial and error, hard to combat
    • emulation by time-delaying, environmental keying
    • behavioural analysis by
      • avoiding suspicious WinAPI calls
      • acting low-and-slow instead of all-at-once
      • unhooking/direct syscalls may work

EDR Evasion Techniques

For detailed information on EDR evasion techniques, including:

  • Malware Virtualization
  • API Unhooking
  • Early Cascade Injection
  • Killing Bit techniques
  • Call Stack Obfuscation
  • Sleep Obfuscation
  • Telemetry obfuscation
  • Persistence strategies
  • Event correlation evasion

See the EDR Evasion documentation.

Windows Defender Bypass Techniques

For detailed information on Windows Defender bypass techniques, including ASR bypasses and custom detection rules evasion, see the EDR Evasion documentation.

Hosting Payloads

  • Server Hosting our Payload must
    • Look benign, best if commonly used for file hosting
    • Have SSL/TLS certificate signed by trusted authority
    • Hard to be blocked by target (cloud based)
  • Example
    • Cloud-based file storage: Office365 OneDrive, SharePoint, AWS S3, MS Azure Storage, Google Drive, FireBase Storage
    • CDN: Azure Edge CDN, StackPath, Fastly, Akamai, Google Cloud AppSpot, HerokuApp
    • Serverless Endpoints: AWS Lambda, CloudFlare Workers, DigitalOcean Apps
  • use LOTS Project for help
  • use LOLBINS
    • prefer DLL over EXE
    • indirect execution to circumvent EDR/AV
    • DLL Side-Loading / DLL Hijacking / COM Hijacking / XLL
  • check Microsoft Block Rules to better circumvent defender

Infection Vectors and Chains

Classic File Infection Vectors

MAC

  • initial access is getting harder, for example for MAC you can still bypass
    • Unsigned apps (gets through with few clicks)
    • Office Macros + .SLK Excel4 macros (constrained by gatekeeper)
    • you can use Mystikal
  • Use LNK, CHM, CPL, DLL, MSI, HTML, SVG; hold Office w/macros, ISO, VHD, XSL.

Windows Script Host

  • VBE, VBS, JSE, JS, XSL, HTA, WSF
  • Mostly well detected and subject to AMSI detection. Effectiveness significantly reduced for Office macros due to default security settings blocking macros from the internet (MOTW).
  • Viable strategies for WSH scripts (often requiring MOTW bypass or user interaction):
    • File Dropper
      • download a file from internet/ UNC share or unpack from itself
      • save the file onto workstation
      • run the file directly/indirectly via LOLBIN
    • DotNetToJScript / GadgetToJScript
      • a way to deserialize and run .NET executables in-memory
      • use BinaryFormatter to deserialize them
    • XSL TransformNode
      • simple technique to run XSL/XML files in-memory while maintaining low IOC footprint
    • XLAM Dropper
      • Macro-enabled excel add-in file
      • when dropped to %APPDATA%\Microsoft\Excel\XLSTART, they are auto-executed when starting excel
    • Microsoft Compiled Help Messages
      • can be used to run a system command whenever user browses into them
      • some used to run VBS or quietly install MSI
    • LNK
      • EXE/ZIP embedded into LNK
      • can be polyglot-ted with HTA/ISO/PDF/ZIP/RAR/7z
      • use icons to weaponize, inspect with LEcmd to make sure not disclosing MAC & hostname
      • always run through a LOLBIN like conhost.exe
    • HTML Smuggling
      • body onload callback
      • optional setTimeout delay or direct entrypoint call
      • embedded payload footprint
      • actual logic
        • create a JavaScript Blob object holding raw file data
        • if operating on IE use msSaveOrOpenBlob
        • else, create a dynamic <a style="display:none"></a> HTML node
        • invoke URL.createObjectURL() and set <a href="...">
        • set download name via <a>.download
        • programmatically click the anchor to trigger the download
      • use detect-headless to identify sandboxes
      • run anti-headless logic after some time elapses
      • Can bypass most secure gateways, but the downloaded file (e.g., ISO, ZIP, LNK, document) still faces endpoint scrutiny. If the smuggled file relies on macros (e.g., .docm), it will likely be blocked by default Office security unless the user explicitly enables content.
    • COM Hijack
  • every VBA strategy requires launcher and often needs to overcome default macro security blocks:
    • WScript.Shell
    • WMI Win32_Process::Create
    • Shell(...)
    • etc

Complex Infection Chains

Containerized Malware

  • Files downloaded from internet have Mark of the Web(MOTW) taint flag
  • Default Behavior: Office documents having MOTW flag have their macros blocked by default, preventing automatic execution. This is a major mitigation against traditional macro-based attacks.
  • You can download it from intranet or trusted locations to circumvent this (less common for initial access).
  • Some container file formats do not propagate MOTW flag to inner files when extracted, providing a potential bypass:

[!Note] (Windows 11 22H2+): ISOs opened via double-click in Explorer inherit MOTW. Using Mount-DiskImage via PowerShell typically avoids propagation; validate on your build.

Chains Recipe

  • In‑the‑wild sample
    • Spear-Phishing
    • Link in mail or Link in PDF
    • HTML Smuggling drops ISO or ZIP
    • ZIP contains RTLO‑tricked .EXE disguised as .PDF being legit 7‑Zip executable
      • .PDF.EXE when clicked, sideloads benign vcruntime140.dll that imports evil 7za.dll
    • ISO contains LNK + DLL
      • .LNK runs rundll32 evil.dll,SomeExport
  • Delivery - convey your chain (HTML smuggling drop in drive-by download fashion)
  • Container - archive bundling all infection files
    • ISO/IMG/ZIP can contain hidden files
  • Trigger - some way to run our payload (LNK/CHM)
  • Payload - our malware
    • Note: Macro-enabled office documents (.docm, .xlsm) are less reliable for initial execution due to MOTW blocks unless combined with social engineering or specific bypasses.
    • can be macro-enabled office document with MOTW stripped (e.g., delivered inside a container like ISO/VHD)
    • DLL/CPL/XLL to be loaded by trigger directly or indirectly with LOLBIN (XLLs also subject to MOTW blocking if downloaded directly)
    • XLAM to be copied to XLSTART for persistence & abusing office trusted path
    • MSI/MSP to run during silent installation (MOTW stripped)
    • VbaProject.OTM for outlook persistence
    • .EXE + .DLL executing through side-loading attack
  • Decoy - keep your victim happy by displaying some interesting stuff

Successful Strategies

# plant evil.xlam to %APPDATA%\Microsoft\Excel\XLSTART so that next time user opens up Excel it will get loaded
cmd /c echo f | xcopy /Q/R/S/Y/H/G/I evil.ini %APPDATA%\Microsoft\Excel\XLSTART | decoy.pdf

# Plant VbaProject.otm to %APPDATA%\Microsoft\Outlook\VbaProject.OTM and alter registry so upon outlook restart VBA will be loaded and act on every new email arrived
cmd /c reg add hkcu\software\micorosft\office\16.0\outlook\security /f /v Level /t reg_dword /d 1 | echo f | xcopy /Q/R/S/Y/H/G/I evil.xlam %APPDATA%\Microsoft\Outlook\VbaProject.OTM | decoy.pdf
# corrected HKCU path
cmd /c reg add hkcu\software\microsoft\office\16.0\outlook\security /f /v Level /t reg_dword /d 1 | echo f | xcopy /Q/R/S/Y/H/G/I evil.xlam %APPDATA%\Microsoft\Outlook\VbaProject.OTM | decoy.pdf

# your ZIP/ISO/IMG will contain signed executable prone to DLL Hijacking/side-loading and appropriate malicious DLL
cmd /c DISM.exe | decoy.pdf

# load .DLL through LOLBIN
cmd /c rundll32 evil.dll,Infect | decoy.pdf

# LNK/CHM that runs PowerShell to locate own .ZIP, then unpacks ZIP contents elsewhere then changes dir into there, then registers .XLL (having stripped MOTW)

# ClickOnce deployment requires several local files; bundle into ZIP/ISO, hide them, then deploy ClickOnce followed by opening decoy.pdf

# PowerShell might use Unblock-File on .MSI and then silently install it
powershell Unblock-File evil.msi; msiexec /q /i .\evil.msi ; .\decoy.pdf

# install signed MSI and apply an unsigned MST
powershell msiexec /q /i .\Zoom-signed-installer.msi TRANSFORMS=evil.mst ; .\decoy.pdf

# run WSH script
cmd /c wscript evil.wsf | decoy.pdf

# LNK/CHM that runs PowerShell to locate its own ZIP, then unpacks ZIP contents elsewhere, changes directory and runs tasks (e.g., deploy ClickOnce)

VBA Infection Strategies

  • Important Note: The effectiveness of traditional VBA macro execution on document open (AutoOpen, Document_Open) is significantly diminished due to Microsoft's default security policy blocking macros in files downloaded from the internet (MOTW). Successful execution often requires social engineering to have the user explicitly trust the document/location or alternative execution methods (like COM hijacking triggered later, Add-Ins, etc.).
  • Alt+F11IM - quickly inserts VBA module into a document
  • abuse path
    • execute
    • file dropper
    • COM hijack
    • DotNetToJScript
  • use of WinAPI is strongly inadvisable due to detection
  • GetUserNameA might be fine but things like CreateProcessA is a big no-no
  • AutoOpen,Document_Open, etc can be used to auto-run our script

Attack Surface Reduction Rules

Execute

  • Most basic strategy is to simply run some command with LOLBIN. Subject to macro execution policies.
  • Avoid running immediately; prefer persistence. Consider COM/DLL hijacking and always use LOLBINs.
  • useful ones
    • Wscript.Shell.Exec - prefix with obf_ to facilitate later obfuscation
    • InvokeVerbEx - evades detection but sometimes doesn't work with LOLBIN
    • RDS.DataSpace - supposed to be obsolete, but still works
  • use AMSITools to review AMSI events
# evade ASR
CreateObject("WScript.Shell") == CreateObject("new=72C24DD5-D70A-4388-8A42-98424B88AFB8")

# full sample to evade ASR
Sub obf_LaunchCommand(ByVal obf_command As String)
  On Error GoTo obf_ProcError
  Dim obf_launcher As String
  Dim obf_cmd
  With CreateObject("new:72C24DD5-D70A-4388-8A42-98424B88AFB8")
       With .Exec(obf_command)
            .Terminate
       End With
  End With
obf_ProcError:
End Sub

# RDS.DataSpace
Sub obf_LaunchCommand(ByVal obf_command As String)
  On Error GoTo obf_ProcError
  Dim obf_objOL, obf_shellObj
  Set obf_objOL = CreateObject("new:BD96C5566-65A3-11D0-983A-00C04FC29E36")
  Set obf_shellObj = obf_objOL.CreateObject("Shell.Application", "")
  obf_shellObj.ShellExecute obf_command

obf_ProcError
End Sub

DotNetToJScript

  • DotNetToJScript - runs .NET assemblies in-memory through Assembly.Load. Still requires the initial VBA/JScript execution, which is often blocked.

File Dropper

  • Deadly as long as AV/EDR not detect our dropped payload OnWrite. The initial macro execution to drop the file is the primary hurdle due to default security.
  • files can be pulled from
    • internet
    • office file structures
    • inside VBA code itself - not good

COM Hijack

  • Plants dodgy COM server via registry key in HKCU that overrides HKLM system defaults. This is a persistence/later execution technique, bypassing the initial macro block issue, but the initial planting still needs to occur.
  • create registry key structure using VBA
  • drop a DLL file to HDD
  • wait until system/application picks that COM object up and instantiate it
  • beware your DLL might be executed hundreds time per minute
  • implement single-instance / single-run logic
  • don't hijack MMDeviceEnumerator, user sees issues
  • use CacheTask -> {0358B920-0AC7-98F4-58E32CD89148}
  • learn more here

Lures

  • Present plausible pretext that gets removed after macros run ( like docusign or adjust to your version). Modern lures often need to convince the user to click "Enable Content" or move the file to a trusted location.
  • we can leverage shapes (images, text boxes, macro cycles through them)
  • big blob of shellcode embedded in VBA stands out
  • we can use
    • shellcode or commands in document properties
    • word variables
    • word/excel/powerpoint parts
    • VBA forms
    • spreadsheet cells
    • Word ActiveDocument.Paragraphs

Alternative AutoRuns

  • Proxy sandboxes like Zscaler are sensitive to Auto_Open(), that might give away our maldoc. These autoruns are also subject to the default macro blocking policies.
  • Workboot_SheetCalculate += RAND() might be useful
  • MS Word Remote Templates are a good choice as well
  • Office offers customizing ribbon based on CustomUI XML; we can abuse the onLoad part as well
  • ActiveX controls can be inserted into document, but will be called a lot so keep it simple. Also subject to security controls.

Exotic VBA Carriers

  • MS Office
    • Access .accde, .mdb, PowerPoint, Publisher .pub
    • Visio .vsdm, Visio97 .vsd , MS Project .mpp
    • Publisher RTF files
    • Outlook ThisOutLookSession, VBAProject.OTM
  • SCADA Systems
    • Siemens SIMATIC HMI WinCC
    • General Electric HMI Scada iFix
    • IGSS schneider-electric
  • CAD Software
    • VBA Module for AutoCAD / VBA Manager in AutoCAD 2021
    • ProgeCAD Professional
    • SOLIDWORKS .swp,.swb VBA Project files
    • DS CATIA V5
    • Bentley MicroStation CONNECT .MVBA files
  • Others
    • ArcMap .MXT files
    • Oscilloscopes Keysight E5071C Network Analyzer
    • TIBCO Statistica Visual Basic .SVB analysis configuration
    • Rocket Terminal Emulator
    • MicroFocus InfoConnect Desktop

VBA Stream Manipulation

  • VBA macros are stored in vbaProject.bin OLE stream modules
  • each module consists of
    • PerformanceCache - compiled VBA code, office version specific
    • CompressedSourceCode - compressed VBA with MS proprietary algorithm
  • VBA Stomping relies on the fact that Office prefers executing PerformanceCache if its version matches, so we can use malicious performance cache and innocuous compressed code. Detection for stomping has improved, and the macro execution itself is still subject to security policies.
  • EvilClippy offers other useful features as well
    • Hide VBA from GUI
    • Remove metadata stream
    • Set random module names
    • Make VBA Project unviewable/locked
    • EvilClippy.exe -s fakecode.vba -t 2016x8666 macrofile.doc
  • VBA Purging
    • removes PerformanceCache from module and _VBA_PROJECT streams
    • changes MODULEOFFSET to 0
    • removes all __SRP_# streams
    • this removes strings representing VBA code parts, lowering detection potential

Evasion Tactics

  • Uglify - remove empty lines, add random indentation, insert garbage code & comments
  • Rename variables and function/sub names
  • Randomize functions order
  • Obfuscate strings
  • Avoid overly long lines
  • Payload obfuscation is trickier
  • use VisualBasicObfuscator
  • Sandbox Evasion
    • detect if running in sandbox environment, don't run any further. Doesn't bypass the default user-facing macro block.
    • validation of username/domain
    • uptime check
  • internet-exposed IPv4 geolocation & reverse‑PTR
    • weaker stuff (hardware,process list, NIC MAC addresses)
  • Office Files Encryption
    • Powerful evasion technique against static analysis but does not bypass the runtime macro execution blocks based on MOTW.
    • Office documents can be password-protected / encrypted
    • Excel always tries hardcoded password value of VelvetSweatshop
    • Powerpoint always tries /01Hannes Ruescher/01
    • use msoffice-crypt.exe
  • Office trusted path + AMSI evasion
    • Relies on getting the file into a trusted path first, bypassing the initial MOTW block.
    • requires disabling/patching optics
    • sometimes works
  • checkout zip motw for a sample MOTW evasion

MSI Shenanigans

Installation

  • MSI installer can be built with WiX toolset, which brings us several properties
  • there is a <CustomAction> tag letting us run .DLL, .EXE, .VBScript/Jscript
  • After installation we can safely uninstall MSI, leaving no trace on HDD
  • Can run
    • inner VBScript/JScript in-memory
    • inner .NET assembly in-memory
    • inner EXE file by extracting it to C:\Windows\Installer\MSIXXXX.tmp
  • when running EXE, parent-child relationship gets dechained into wininit.exe -> services.exe -> msiexec.exe -> MSIxxxx.tmp

Types

  • .MSI - compound storage file format comprising of a set of databases structured in OLE format
  • .MSP - Windows installer patch file
  • .MSM - Windows merge module installer's file (not usable)
  • .MST - Windows installer transformation file
  • Files are stored in .CAB archives, that are bundled into MSI media table
  • To extract contents from .MSI we can use lessmsi, ORCA or msidump
  • ORCA & MSISnatcher lets us backdoor existing MSI file

Manual

  • compile WXS into WIXOBJ
  • links WIXOBJ into MSI
wix\candle.exe project.exs x64
light.exe -ext WixUIExtension -cultures:en-us -dc1:high -out evil.msi project.wixobj
  • use rogue-dot-net\generateRouteDotNet.py to compile custom .NET DLL based off shellcode
  • create self-exctractable, standalone .NET CustomAction DLL with WiX MakeSfxCa
  • compile WXS into WIXOBJ
  • link WIXOBJ into MSI
python generateRogueDotNet.py -M --dotnet-ver v2 -t plain -s CustomAction -n CustomActions -m MyMethod -r -c x64 -o CustomAction.dll beacon64.bin
MakeSfxCA.exe CustomAction.CA.dll x64\sfxca.dll CustomAction.dll wix\Microsoft.Deployment.WindowsInstaller.dll
candle.exe project.wxs -arch x64
light.exe -ext WixUIExtension -cultures:en-us -dc1:high -out evil.msi project.wixobj
  • install, wait, uninstall
evil.msi /q && sleep 5 && msiexec /q /x evil.msi

Backdoor Existing MSI

  • we can add rows to existing MSI thus backdooring it
  • Interesting Fields
    • Binary - table that holds binary data in-memory during MSI installation
    • CustomAction - actions to perform pre/post installation
    • InstallExecuteSequence - sequence-ordered list of actions that take place during installation
    • File - files to be extracted into system
    • Component - describes into which directory should file be extracted
    • Media - CAB files inside of MSI
    • Registry - Contains all registry keys & values to be created
    • Shortcut - scatters LNK all around the system
  • Process
    • copy putty-installer.msi to backdoored.msi
    • open orca.exe and open backdorred.msi inside it
    • tables -> CustomAction -> right click -> add row -> Action=whatever1, type=1250, source=INSTALLDIR, target=calc
    • tables -> InstallExecuteSequence -> sort tables by Sequence column -> add row -> Action=whatever1, condition= NOT REMOVE, sequence = 6599
    • file -> save as -> backdoored.msi
    • test it
  • we can automate the process using MSISnatcher

Windows App Package Format

  • .MSIX which supersedes .MSI by enforcing publisher authentication via code signing certificate
  • installed .APPX/.MSIX goes into %ProgramFiles%\WindowsApps\<PublisherName>.<AppName>_<AppVersion>_<Arch>_<Hash>
  • extensions
    • MSIX the zip of signed installation package
    • APPX a directory containing EXECUTABLES/Program, .AppxManifest.xml, [Content_Types.xml], assets, icons, other files
    • APPXBUNDLE, MSIBUNDLE contains .APPX/.MSIX and other files
    • APPINSTALLER - XML file pointing towards .APPXBUNDLE or .MSIX installers
  • deployment
    • double-click
    • windows store
    • browsing a website with ms-appinstaller link
    • via PowerShell Add-Package -Path .\evil.appx
    • via remote host through DCOM - checkout ProvisionAppx
    • a static Azure blob storage website -> HTML with ms-appinstaller URL handler -> use a signed binary (179$)

Executables

Basics

Static Detection

  • Static Detection is simplest to evade, simply use packers
    • PE Protector - encrypt & anti-debug/anti-x
    • PE Compressor - reduce the file size
    • .NET Obfuscators - protect IP, symbol names, strings
    • Script Obfuscators - VBA/VBScript, PowerShell, BAT
    • Virtualizers - translate input PE executable machine code into custom VM
    • Executable Signers - steal genuine EXE certificate + properties and apply on implant
    • Resource Editors - remove Icon, version information
    • Shellcode Loaders - load shellcode in a stealthily
    • Shellcode Encoders - Shikata Ga Nai
  • you can use ProtectMyTooling for various packers
  • Note on Online Scanners: While services like AntiScan.Me can give an initial idea of detection rates, they don't replace testing against a local, isolated machine representative of the target environment. Defenses like Windows Defender may behave differently in a real system compared to online sandboxes.
  • Targeted Evasion: Aiming for a universal "0 detection rate" can be time-consuming. It's often more effective to gather intelligence on the target's specific security solutions and focus evasion efforts accordingly.

Offensive CI/CD Pipeline

  • RedTeam Malware Development
  • Test Stability, Reliability, Security
  • Artifact Obfuscation
  • Test Against Offline EDR
  • Watermarking & IOC Collection
  • Operational Use
  • Implant Tracking in Threat Intelligence Feeds

PE Backdoor

  • Inject Shellcode Into Legitimate Executable
    • middle of current code section
    • into separate section
  • Redirect Execution
    • change AdressOfEntryPoint
    • Hijack branching call JMP, CALL
    • TLS Callback
  • Sign it With Self-signed/Custom Authentication
    • LimeLighter
    • Mangle
    • ScareCrow
    • osslsigncode.exe
  • Spoofed Certificates: Signing an implant, even with a spoofed or invalid certificate, can sometimes reduce detection by AVs that don't thoroughly validate the certificate chain. However, be aware of potential legal consequences.
  • Timestamping: The choice of Time Stamp Authority (TSA) server when signing can also unexpectedly influence detection rates by different AV products.

PE Watermarking

  • Keep Track of implant/malware/IOC
  • Inject Custom Watermark to Payloads and Poll VirusTotal
  • Where to Inject
    • DOS Stub
    • PE Header Properties: TimeStamp, Checksum
    • Overlay
    • Additional PE Section
    • Resources: Version Information, Manifest
  • What Should it Look Like
    • Random SHA256 might be enough
    • Encrypted engagement metadata

PE Attribute Cloning and Code Signing Considerations

  • Cloning Attributes: Copying file attributes (version information, icons, product names, original filenames, etc.) from legitimate binaries can help an implant blend in.
    • When cloning, choose binaries that are legitimately present and commonly used on the target system. For instance, cloning an iTunes binary for a Windows Server target would be suspicious.
    • Consider cloning attributes from unsigned legitimate Windows binaries (e.g., at.exe) and not signing the implant. This may be more effective than cloning a signed binary (like RuntimeBroker.exe) and then signing the implant with a spoofed certificate, especially if the EDR/AV can easily verify signatures of its own system's binaries.
  • Testing is Crucial: Always test cloned and/or signed implants on a system mimicking the target environment, as behavior can differ significantly from online scanning services.

Shellcode

For detailed information on shellcode loaders, techniques, and implementation, including:

  • Allocation, write, and execution phases
  • Local vs remote injection
  • Methods to hide shellcode
  • Storage solutions (including Certificate Table approach)

See the Shellcode documentation.

Formats

  • EXE
    • use EV Cert code signing if you can afford it
    • otherwise self-signed LimeLighter,ScareCrow,osslsigncode
  • DLL
    • typical no subject for prevalence/reputation score
    • offer delayed & de-chained execution primitives
    • not visible in process list
    • facilitate DLL hijacking attacks
    • can be used by LOLBIN
    • cleanup is hard, to remove first need to exit threads and then free that library
    • call kernel32!FreeLibraryAndExitThread when your evil DLL execution is done
    • keep DLLMain as simple as possible, or better don't used it at all, use the bullet point below
    • DLL hijacking/proxying/side-loading/planting/search-order hijacking to evade detection
    • use Spartacus or Crassus for DLL Hijacking automation
    • for DLL Side-Loading use Frida+WFH,Koppeling, Siofra or Spartacus and Crassus
    • Beware MS Defender might trigger on DLL Side-Loading/Hijacking
  • CPL
    • control panel applet
    • double-clickable
  • WLL
    • word add-in
    • not double-clickable
  • XLL
    • excel add-in
    • double-clickable
    • if has MOTW gets blocked

Additional Evasion Techniques

For detailed information on EDR evasion techniques, including:

  • String obfuscation
  • Entropy manipulation and file bloating
  • Time-delayed execution
  • Sandbox detection and environmental keying
  • AMSI and ETW evasion
  • Call stack obfuscation
  • DripLoader technique

See the EDR Evasion documentation.

Emerging Initial-Access

  • Cloud identity & OAuth token theft (AiTM proxy kits, consent phishing, pass‑the‑cookie).
  • MFA fatigue / prompt bombing.
  • Exploiting edge devices & perimeter zero‑days (Ivanti, Citrix, Fortinet, Atlassian, etc.).
  • Third‑party package & CI/CD compromise

Discussion

No comments yet — start the thread.

Sign in to join the discussion.

/More from SnailSploit/Claude-Red

SnailSploit· 5d agoSandbox
offensive-k8s-attacks

Prompts · Python · v0.1.0

Kubernetes cluster attack techniques covering the full attack lifecycle from initial foothold in a pod to cluster-wide compromise. Covers service account token theft and impersonation, RBAC misconfiguration exploitation including wildcard permissions and privilege escalation via role binding, direct etcd access for secret extraction, kubelet API abuse on port 10250 and read-only port 10255, pod escape via hostPID hostNetwork and hostPath volume mounts, Kubernetes secrets enumeration and decoding, admission controller bypass techniques, network policy bypass and lateral movement, cloud metadata service access from pods for credential theft on AWS EKS GCP GKE and Azure AKS, CRD and operator abuse for persistence, and node compromise via DaemonSet deployment. Tools include kubectl, kube-hunter, peirates, kubeaudit, kdigger, kubeletctl. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1609 Container Administration Command, T1610 Deploy Container, T1613 Container and Resource Discovery. Use this skill when assessing Kubernetes clusters, attacking from within a compromised pod, exploiting RBAC or kubelet misconfigurations, or performing cloud-native lateral movement.

#claude-ai#claude-pt#claude-skills

0 6.9K
SnailSploit· 5d agoCommunity
offensive-crypto-attacks

Prompts · Python · v0.1.0

Systematic methodology for identifying and exploiting cryptographic implementation weaknesses in real-world applications. Covers padding oracle attacks against CBC-mode ciphers with PKCS7 padding (Vaudenay's original attack through modern padbuster automation), ECB mode exploitation including block cut-and-paste and byte-at-a-time decryption, hash length extension attacks against SHA1/SHA256/MD5-based MACs using HashPump, RSA vulnerabilities including small public exponent, common modulus, Bleichenbacher PKCS1v1.5 padding oracle, and Coppersmith's method for partial key recovery. Addresses weak PRNG exploitation targeting time-seeded generators and Mersenne Twister MT19937 state recovery from observed outputs, timing side-channel attacks against comparison operations, nonce reuse in AES-GCM leading to authentication key recovery, and key derivation weaknesses including insufficient iteration counts and missing salts. Primary tooling includes padbuster, RsaCtfTool, hashpump, and PyCryptodome for building custom exploit payloads. Maps to CWE-327 (Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm), CWE-328 (Use of Weak Hash), and CWE-330 (Use of Insufficiently Random Values). Emphasizes black-box identification of vulnerable implementations before transitioning to targeted exploitation.

#claude-ai#claude-pt#claude-skills

0 6.9K
SnailSploit· 5d agoCommunity
offensive-tls-attacks

Prompts · Python · v0.1.0

Comprehensive methodology for auditing and exploiting TLS/SSL implementations and misconfigurations across network services and mobile applications. Covers protocol downgrade attacks including POODLE (CVE-2014-3566) against SSLv3 CBC padding, DROWN (CVE-2016-0800) cross-protocol attack leveraging SSLv2 export ciphers to decrypt TLS sessions, and FREAK (CVE-2015-0204) forcing RSA export-grade key exchange. Addresses BEAST (CVE-2011-3389) exploiting CBC IV predictability in TLS 1.0, CRIME (CVE-2012-4929) and BREACH targeting TLS-level and HTTP-level compression oracles respectively, and Heartbleed (CVE-2014-0160) for OpenSSL memory disclosure. Covers certificate validation bypass techniques for applications with improper hostname verification or chain validation, certificate pinning bypass using Frida and Objection for mobile application interception, HSTS bypass via NTP manipulation and subdomain exploitation, TLS 1.3 0-RTT replay attacks against non-idempotent endpoints, mutual TLS (mTLS) authentication attacks including client certificate theft and relay, and Certificate Transparency log monitoring for reconnaissance. Primary tooling includes testssl.sh for comprehensive TLS auditing, sslyze for Python-integrated scanning, sslscan for quick cipher enumeration, and tlsx for high-speed TLS probing at scale. Maps to CWE-295 (Improper Certificate Validation), CWE-319 (Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information), and CWE-757 (Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation).

#claude-ai#claude-pt#claude-skills

0 6.9K
SnailSploit· 5d agoSandbox
offensive-linux-privesc

Prompts · Python · v0.1.0

Comprehensive Linux privilege escalation methodology for offensive security engagements. Covers the full attack surface from a low-privilege shell to root: SUID/SGID binary abuse via GTFOBins, Linux capabilities exploitation (cap_setuid, cap_dac_override, cap_dac_read_search), sudo misconfigurations including NOPASSWD rules and Baron Samedit (CVE-2021-3156), cron job abuse through writable scripts, PATH hijacking, and wildcard injection with tar/rsync/chown. Includes writable /etc/passwd attacks, NFS no_root_squash exploitation, kernel exploits (DirtyPipe CVE-2022-0847, DirtyCow CVE-2016-5195, PwnKit CVE-2021-4034), Docker group container escapes, LD_PRELOAD and LD_LIBRARY_PATH hijacking for shared library injection, systemd service misconfigurations, and sensitive file enumeration for credential harvesting. Integrates automated enumeration with LinPEAS, linux-exploit-suggester, pspy for process monitoring, and GTFOBins for binary exploitation. Each technique includes detection signatures and defender-side visibility to support purple team operations. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1548 (Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism) and related sub-techniques. Designed for authorized penetration testing, red team engagements, and CTF competitions where you hold a low-privilege shell and need to escalate to root.

#claude-ai#claude-pt#claude-skills

0 6.9K