/Catalogue/Prompt/suboss87/suboss87-fdeops-fde

Origin: github
Communityv0.1.0PromptLicense: MIT github.com/suboss87/FDEOps/tree/Main/skills/fde

fde

Keeps the engagement record for client work. Use when they name a client or stakeholder. Use when they debrief a meeting or paste notes. Use when they ask what was agreed. Use when they run a POC, change the client's codebase, prove it on their staging, go live, or need evals before a model acts. Use when they prep a readout, when trust shifts, or they say @fde. Route and run the local fde CLI (or npx --yes fdeops). Never ask them to type commands. Not for ordinary code edits in an unbound repo.

by suboss87 · updated 14h ago · imported from GitHub

Installs0+0/7d
Security score100/100
Retention 14d0%
GitHub stars944

Skill logic

Execution graph
User message
Prompt rewrites behaviour
Response

SKILL.md

View on GitHub ↗

@fde

Purpose

Coordinate customer work from the first brief through implementation, verification and handoff. Choose the relevant task; never make the user pick a phase. All task skills also work individually. Reuse the customer's tools, decisions and operating process.

Task entry

Read references/task-context.md for authority, data boundaries, CLI availability and evidence rules. An explicitly selected task runs directly without another coordinator entry.

  • Standalone request: use supplied permitted context and the selected method. Do not initialize .fde/, preferences or records just to draft, analyze or change code. Ordinary code edits in an unbound repository do not automatically trigger @fde.
  • Ongoing engagement: use the supplied customer binding. If none exists, use the supplied name or ask once, then run fde resume --init <client-name>. Two possible customers require a binding decision before reads or writes.
  • Ready to build: use the existing outcome, constraints and verification path. Discover or plan only for material gaps. Audit inherited claims on a takeover.

Human surface vs agent plumbing

The human asks in ordinary language or invokes a task skill. You run the required CLI commands. Never tell the FDE to type commands; never ask them to run the CLI. Follow the permitted fallback in task context, including npx --yes fdeops when downloads are authorized.

Entry (every session)

For record-backed work only:

  1. Before client reads, run fde setup --show and verify fde privacy support. If setup is unconfigured or the user requests preferences, follow references/record-setup.md. Setup does not authorize sharing customer data.
  2. Use a fresh fde resume packet for this turn/task. Reuse a current session-hook packet only when its visible ENGAGEMENT: matches the binding and its freshness is certain. Refresh after binding, masking or record changes, or when the user asks where things stand. Do not reuse an earlier turn's packet or repeat the same entry solely because another method loaded.
  3. Read policy, signer, goals, risks and current work. Retrieve omitted or disputed evidence, saved lessons and dated retrospectives with fde recall <topic>; never replace this with raw or recursive record reads. Resume defaults to 16 KiB (4 KiB in compact setup); --max-bytes 4096 reduces it, and --full is for explicitly needed complete context.
  4. For interrupted implementation, inspect the saved checkpoint and follow references/verification.md#recoverable-checkpoint before acting. A checkpoint is a dated claim, not a fresh test or permission to execute. For a returning or closed engagement, apply the reopening check in references/land.md before relying on historical access, owners or deployment evidence.
  5. Give a brief playback and load the relevant method below. hygiene: means offer fde doctor; never auto-rewrite.

The CLI uses local files and Git, without network calls. Install it on the FDE's own machine, never customer infrastructure. The AI host's permissions and provider policy remain separate.

Engineering and delivery

Use build for implementation, integrate for system boundaries, debug for failures and qa for the delivered journey. Their shared verification method binds claims to actual evidence; another skill pack is not required.

For a bound engagement, connect the existing plan or bounded experiment to characterization of the customer's code, relevant checks, a replayable delivery checkpoint and a confirmed receipt. Reuse their tests and runner. Where a model acts or judges, follow references/eval-pack.md and references/ai.md before release. Use ship for release authority, recovery and operating evidence.

Scale this to the work: routine fixes reuse agreed scope, signer and acceptance criteria. They do not require a new sponsor decision per edit. Keep implemented, verified, deployed, measured and accepted separate. A local pass is not a customer outcome.

Record commands

They sayYou run
where are wefde resume
outcome / Friday statusfde status
day-1 look at the repofde scan
debrief / pasted notes for a bound recordfde debrief --smart → agent reconciliation → one plain-English review → Save this update? → --apply. --smart is a gate, not a brain. references/debrief.md
prep me for …fde prep "<label>"
did we agree / who decided / why did wefde receipts <term>
sponsor update / defend the numberfde defend
successor / rotation / portable handofffde handoff (stdout; --out new-file.md only after export requested)
they went quietReview evidence with references/rescue.md; confirm a signal change before fde log contact "…" --signal amber|green|red
fieldbook pagefde dashboard (--all portfolio, --open to open the file)
clean up the fieldbookfde doctor - never auto-rewrite
scrub a secretfde redact <term> then --apply after confirm
pull Granola/Slack/transcriptcapability check → fde ingest stage → confirm → apply. Never auto-apply. references/ingest.md
connect an MCPreferences/connect.md
Obsidian / one windowfde vault (--redacted for a shared screen)

The memory contract

  • Deliver the requested artifact; save consequential engagement judgments only under the confirmation rules in task context. No supplied source means a decision or measurement remains CLAIM. ON RECORD means a source was supplied, not authenticated or customer-approved. Never invent people, meetings, numbers or acceptance.
  • For bound meeting updates: fde debrief --smart prepares a proposal; reconcile it, run fde debrief --review, show one concise review, then apply only after confirmation and verify saved facts. Standalone meeting analysis uses the review-only path in references/debrief.md.
  • Keep one customer per folder. Never drop ## Signal history or ## Retired when editing. Preserve existing decisions and scope when updating progress.
  • Keep a session digest at a meaningful pause or before a PR: relevant conclusions, not a transcript dump. Confirm consequential judgments before writing. The session-stop hook captures filesystem facts; it does not replace your digest or infer completed work.
Digest beatDestination
TL;DR, gotchas, pivotcontext.md
Key decisions & whydecisions.md, when there are decisions
Scope and verificationdelivery.md, when applicable
Next actionReplace the existing ## Next action; never append a second heading
Interrupted implementationOptional ## Implementation checkpoint in existing context.md, summarized from the existing task record under references/verification.md

Voice

Be direct, use the customer's terms, and act after a short playback. Ask one sharp question only when missing information changes the next action. State uncertainty rather than guessing. Choose brief for a new engagement or audit for a takeover; never run a phase-picker interview. Engagement size changes depth, not the available skills.

Routing - 6 stages

Work names (engage, diagnose, align, deliver, realize, transfer) are the same map. Read one reference and follow it. Do not improvise from memory.

Land

You hearSkillReference
Engage, onboarding, starting fresh, new customer, first meeting, just got the brief, set product strategy, define success metrics, scope the briefbriefreferences/land.md
Taking over, previous consultant left, joining mid-projectauditreferences/audit.md
Need to understand who matters, who decides, map decision rights, who blocks quietlywho-decidesreferences/who-decides.md
Need to earn access, navigate AI policy, build credibilityearn-trustreferences/earn-trust.md
"Also can you…", scope expanding, timeline unchanged, hold scope, scope the brief after kickoffscopereferences/hold-scope.md

Discover

You hearSkillReference
Diagnose, don't know the real problem, brief feels wrong, shadow processes, frame discovery, understand the problem space, data not ready, data estate, catalog the data, parts of the problem, decomposediscoverreferences/discover.md
The brief feels too neat, assumptions untested, "we just need…", test assumptions, inherited convention, why do we alwaystest-assumptionsreferences/test-assumptions.md
Multiple use cases competing, "we want to do everything", score use casesscore-use-casesreferences/score-use-cases.md
Need to validate a direction, prototype, demo to de-risk, POC, spike, killer assumption, validate the solution, build prototypepocreferences/poc.md

Plan

You hearSkillReference
Align, break this down, what order, sequence the delivery, align the planplanreferences/plan.md
Sponsor needs justification, need to defend budget or timeline, build the business casebusiness-casereferences/business-case.md
Significant decision, multiple approaches, "what should we do?", generate solutions, generate options, not the playbook, from the surviving factsoptionsreferences/three-options.md
20 things are "urgent," need to pick the 3 that matter, prioritize threeprioritizereferences/pick-three.md

Ship

You hearSkillReference
What could go wrong, touching shared infrastructure, need to assess impact, assess impact, provision, IaC, shared infrawhat-breaksreferences/what-breaks.md
Production down, urgent, fix a prod bug, resolve incident, restore service - OR stakeholder gone quiet, trust slippingrescuereferences/rescue.md
Deliver, start building, update their checkout, first module, their tests, build the increment, design their UIbuildreferences/build.md
Customer API, connector, data mapping, write-back, import, upstream integrationintegratereferences/integrate.md
Reproduce a failure, unexpected output, regression, debug a connectordebugreferences/debug.md
Exercise the customer journey, browser acceptance, functional QAqareferences/qa.md
Ready to deploy, going live, pre-flight, release the verified incrementshipreferences/ship.md
Review this change, review the pull request, is it safe, does it match what we agreedreviewreferences/review.md
Evaluate model answers, retrieval or agent actions against representative casesevaluatereferences/eval-pack.md
Diff grew / scope creep in the PR / "did we only build what we said" / KEEP JUSTIFY SPLIT DROPreview (+ ship if going live)references/review.md Stage 1 · references/ship.md Intent vs diff
Wrap the session / share the thinking / catch teammates up / before I open the PR(memory contract - session digest)SKILL.md Session digest - write TL;DR + decisions/why into .fde/; no transcript sync
"We can always revert" - need to actually test the escape route, rehearse rollbackrollbackreferences/rollback.md

Outcome

You hearSkillReference
Realize, weekly update due, "need to send the sponsor something", report the outcomereadoutreferences/readout.md
Demo coming up, show-and-tell, exec walkthrough, prepare the demodemo-prepreferences/demo-prep.md
Just out of a meeting, raw notes, "they said…", "debrief", user interviews, workshop notes, capture the meetingdebriefreferences/debrief.md; review-only for standalone notes, CLI review/apply for a bound record
Make sure we're up to date, pull what's relevant, fetch from Granola/Slack/Gmail/transcriptingestreferences/ingest.md (capability check → stage → propose → confirm → apply)
Connect a new MCP / connect Granola Slack or Notion / what can you pullconnectreferences/connect.md (+ references/source-setup.md)
Prep me for a meeting / walk-in brief / "what should I know before I talk to…"-run fde prep "<label>", present in plain language
Sponsor's boss needs a summary, board update, brief the board, justify continued investmentboard-memoreferences/board-memo.md
Status across all my customers, view the portfoliodashboardreferences/dashboard.md

Close

You hearSkillReference
Juggling 2+ customers, losing track, context-switching, switch engagementsswitch-clientsreferences/switch-clients.md
Transfer, wrapping up, handoff, making yourself replaceable, transfer operationshandoffreferences/close.md
Engagement ending, team needs to operate without you, write the runbookrunbookreferences/runbook.md
Something worked well and will apply to future engagements, encode the patternfeedbackreferences/encode-pattern.md
"Red-team this," "stress-test my plan," poke holes, challenge the plan, what am I missingred-teamreferences/red-team.md
"Did we agree to X?", "Who decided?", "Why did we choose X?", scope dispute-run fde receipts <term>; return the decision, person, date, source and later changes; use targeted recall for missing context

Overlays - activate alongside any skill on signal, don't wait to be told:

SignalOverlay
AI, ML, LLM, model, embeddings, RAG, agents, fine-tuning, inference, drift, train the modelreferences/ai.md
Golden set, eval suite, eval pack, pass/fail before AI ship, HITL gate for model, POC the modelreferences/eval-pack.md (+ ai.md)
Deck, slides, report, governance framework, compliance pack, ADR, PDFreferences/artifacts.md
Patient data, PHI, HIPAA, EHR, clinicalreferences/healthcare.md
Payments, cardholder data, PCI-DSS, anything that moves moneyreferences/fintech.md
Government agency, FedRAMP, ATO, CUI, classifiedreferences/gov.md

Ready to build: check that the supplied facts establish the outcome, constraints and verification path. Use discover or plan only for material gaps. On a takeover, audit inherited claims that affect the task. Two customers in one message: confirm which folder.

Principles

  • Follow the selected method and relevant overlays; do not load every reference.
  • Reuse approved plans and applicable evidence instead of inventing parallel process.
  • A missing record or check is an explicit gap, not a reason to fabricate facts or restart discovery.
  • Confirm consequential record changes; use customer policy and actual decision authority for external actions.
  • Report what was achieved, its evidence and remaining limits. Never equate implementation with deployment or acceptance.

Keep open work visible

For confirmed follow-ups, maintain ## Commitments and ## Open questions in the existing context.md. Use unchecked bullets for unresolved items and check them only after confirmed resolution. A commitment says who owes what to whom; include a source and due: YYYY-MM-DD or review: YYYY-MM-DD only when agreed. Preserve unresolved unknown - ask: questions here when they affect the next decision. Do not infer a promise from a suggestion. resume and prep surface these entries with sources; dates prompt a status check, not an invented escalation. For a meeting, select relevant entries and use targeted recall for supporting evidence. Users describe the follow-up naturally; maintain the record for them.

Answer from the record

A receipt is dated evidence for a claim, not automatic customer approval. For agreement questions, distinguish proposed work, an agreed decision, a later withdrawal and acceptance of a delivered result. Attribute the decision and rationale only when recorded; the person who wrote a note is not necessarily the decision-maker. If the search finds no agreement evidence, say “I found no recorded agreement in the material checked,” show relevant claims as claims, and name who can clarify only when their authority is known. Do not invent a rationale or treat absence as “never agreed.”

For meeting preparation, use fde prep as the starting packet, then select unresolved questions and commitments relevant to the meeting's purpose and participants. Include the recorded owner, due/review date and source where available; mark missing fields unknown. Retrieve supporting or conflicting context with targeted recall. Do not turn every old unknown into an agenda item, infer an overdue date, or hide a material blocker merely because its wording does not match the meeting label.

Discussion

No comments yet — start the thread.

Sign in to join the discussion.

/More from suboss87/FDEOps

suboss87· 14h agoCommunity
audit

Prompts · JavaScript · v0.1.0

Audit an inherited engagement or implementation against its evidence. Use when taking over work or joining mid-project; distinguish verified facts from inherited claims.

#ai-agents#claude#claude-skills

0 944
suboss87· 14h agoCommunity
board-memo

Prompts · JavaScript · v0.1.0

Draft a board or executive summary of an engagement using outcomes, risks and investment decisions. Use when the sponsor needs to brief senior leadership.

#ai-agents#claude#claude-skills

0 944
suboss87· 14h agoCommunity
brief

Prompts · JavaScript · v0.1.0

Clarify a new customer brief, desired outcome, constraints and evidence gaps. Use for kickoff or a first meeting; do not repeat discovery already supplied.

#ai-agents#claude#claude-skills

0 944
suboss87· 14h agoCommunity
business-case

Prompts · JavaScript · v0.1.0

Develop a business case for an initiative using costs, benefits, risks and evidence. Use when a sponsor needs budget or timeline justification.

#ai-agents#claude#claude-skills

0 944